On Tuesday 20 July 2010 14:41:49 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The number of submissions to the Debian popularity-contest collector
> is falling, and has done so for some time now. This can be easily
> seen on http://popcon.debian.org/stat/sub-i386.png >.
>
> This is mostly caused by a fall in the
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 23:50:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:06 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > [...]
> > > and b.) IMHO reportbug-ng should be installed by the default
> > > desktop task.
> >
> > Yes, if it supports bug scripts properly now
Package: reportbug
Version: 4.12.4
Severity: normal
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:50:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:06 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > So, to summarize: a.) I still think reportbug should be able to submit bugs
> > using port 80
>
> Agreed.
Ditto.
As I
On 07/24/2010 02:06 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
[snip]
And then there is the (nowadays perceived) problem that reportbug needs a
working MTA setup or at least outgoing traffic on port 25/587. Both ports are
blocked on almost all my machines, so I still have not much bothered with
reportbug. (I'd us
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 23:50:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:06 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
> [...]
> > and b.) IMHO reportbug-ng should be installed by the default
> > desktop task.
>
> Yes, if it supports bug scripts properly now.
>
It doesn't. I'm still tempted to
On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 15:06 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote:
[...]
> And then there is the (nowadays perceived) problem that reportbug needs a
> working MTA setup or at least outgoing traffic on port 25/587. Both ports are
> blocked on almost all my machines, so I still have not much bothered with
>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:14:23AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow writes:
> > Russ Allbery writes:
> >> Maybe with some tagging as to the origin derivative, so that we can
> >> handle cases where that data isn't useful? There's no guarantee that
> >> the Ubuntu package has mu
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:53:22AM +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote:
> Hi again, Russ:
> On Thursday 22 July 2010 14:21:09 Russ Allbery wrote:
> > "Jesús M. Navarro" writes:
> [...]
> > I don't agree; I think it's very hard to say the same thing about testing.
> I already told you that's about per
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ivan Kohler
* Package name: libnet-plesk-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Jeff Finucane
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Plesk/
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
Description : Perl extension for
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > So, point 2: are we *advertising* reportbug enough to our users?
>
> Perhaps not, but it's literally the very first thing listed on
>
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
>
> which is link
On onsdagen den 17 februari 2010, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> MH> On the other hand, one application will want 16x10 icons, another one
> MH> 24x15, another one may have some effects applied on the flags to better
> MH> fit the UI design, etc.
>
> May be the size must be included into path?
>
> l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christopher Baines
* Package name: fgrun
Version : 1.5.2
Upstream Author : Frederic Bouvier (Project admin)
* URL : http://fgrun.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : FGRun is a g
Hello DD's and Debian Users,
I have installed Debian around an year ago. Recently, I have subscribed to
various mailing lists and reading them on daily basis, whether they are
relevant to me or not. I am still learning about debian.
Prior to the installation of Debian, I don't have any experience
On 07/22/2010 02:46 PM, Hans-J. Ullrich wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> and there is another point, I would like to mention.
>
> The naming of the repository is not well chosen, as it let new and
> unexperienced people to debian feel a wrong way. The names "stable" "testing"
> and "unstable" let the poe
Russ Allbery writes:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>> Why not have the new package ship libGL.so.1 to a more specific filename
>> and create a symlink named libGL.so.1 by hand in its postinst ? That
>> way you can defer doing the diversion until that part of the postinst,
>> by which time the old pac
15 matches
Mail list logo
