On Wednesday, March 18, 2020 6:32:22 PM EDT Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'm currently reviewing some of the autopkgtest regressions that are
> currently blocking python3-defaults with python3.8 as the default python3
> from migrating.
>
> With the current state of the environment being used for autop
Just checking --- this looks like a Really Bad regression in Lintian
2.57.0, correct?
E: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: debian-changelog-file-missing
E: e2fsprogs buildinfo: field-too-long Installed-Build-Depends (5090 chars >
5000)
E: e2fsprogs-udeb udeb: file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile etc/mke2fs.conf
Dear all,
Please cc me if somebody answers it, Does anybody know when boost
1.67 will be out of the archive and boost 1.71 or later will be the
only one in buster cycle. I have been watching 936227 [1] as well as
the python2-rm transition slot [2] as well as the python 3.8
transition slot [3] .
On 3/19/20 11:59 PM, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> ## Introduction
> ###
>
> The Debian Social Team maintains a variety of services under the
> debian.social domain. These services aim to make it easier for Debian
> contributors to share content and collaborate.
> - https://wiki.debian.org/T
Hi,
Quoting Mo Zhou (2020-03-20 16:07:04)
> That said, I agree that we move a step further considering a slim base system
> in a more constructive way. Spontaneously, I'd raise such a question: Is the
> changelogs the only files to blame for the waste of precious space? Some
> packages contains lo
Hello, you have a donation of 4,800,000.00 EUR. I won the lottery
America worth 768 million USD in May 2019 and donate part of it
to five lucky people and charity
homes in memory of my late wife, who died of cancer. Contact me
for more information: (manuelfra...@usa.com)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominik George
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
* Package name: gnome-pass-search-provider
Version : 0.0~20191115+da2db41
Upstream Author : Jonathan Lestrelin
* URL : https://github.com/jle64/gnome-pass-search-pr
Hi Adam,
Thank you for putting this forward, but actually I'm personally
object to trimming changlogs from a normal[1] system. A complete
changelog helps me quickly understand what happened to the
component of the package. Once trimmed, such changelog get crippled. Why
not directly keep only the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lasse Flygenring-Harrsen
* Package name: cava
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Karl Stava
* URL : http://karlstav.github.io/cava/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Console-based Audio Visualizer
Julien Puydt writes:
> Le vendredi 20 mars 2020 à 07:44 +0100, Ansgar a écrit :
>> We should probably also not ship the same changelog in multiple
>> packages, especially when one depends on the other.
>
> Switching to per src:package changelogs would cover that.
This would be useful for the copy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:50:29AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> In the rush for cutting away small bits of minbase, it looks like we forgot
> a big pile of junk: /usr/share/doc/
Honestly, on space constraint systems, isn't the whole /usr/share/doc
directory "junk". Probably not the solution for e
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 8:56 AM Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> I don't know man minbase is, so I don't know what you are
> talking about.
The debootstrap variant option minbase:
https://manpages.debian.org/buster/debootstrap/debootstrap.8.en.html#OPTIONS
"minbase, which only includes required packages
On 20.03.20 00:50, Adam Borowski wrote:
> In the rush for cutting away small bits of minbase [...]
> [trim changelogs]
I don't know man minbase is, so I don't know what you are
talking about.
On a normal desktop/server I'd expect
/usr/share/doc/$PKG/changelog.Debian* to contain the whole history
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nilesh Patra
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-mermaid
Version : 8.4.8
Upstream Author : Knut Sveidqvist
* URL : https://github.com/knsv/mermaid
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaScr
14 matches
Mail list logo
