Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-recipe-scrapers
Version : 14.31.0
Upstream Contact: Hristo Harsev
* URL : https://github.com/hhursev/recipe-scrapers/
* License : MIT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python3-scrape-schema-recipe
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Contact: Micah Cochra
* URL : https://github.com/micahcochran/scrape-schema-recipe
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-extruct
Version : 0.14.0
Upstream Author : Scrapinghub
* URL : https://github.com/scrapinghub/extruct
* License : BSD-3
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-jstyleson
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : linjackson
* URL : https://pypi.org/project/jstyleson/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-html-text
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Scrapinghub Inc
* URL : https://github.com/TeamHG-Memex/html-text
* License : MIT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-mf2py
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Tom Morris
* URL : https://github.com/microformats/mf2py
* License : MIT
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: displaycal
Version : 3.9.6
Upstream Author : Erkan Ozgur Yilmaz
* URL : https://github.com/eoyilmaz/displaycal-py3/
* License : GPL-3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python3-recipe-scrapers
Version : 13.8.0
Upstream Author : Hristo Harsev
* URL : https://github.com/hhursev/recipe-scrapers/
* License : MIT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christian Marillat
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gourmand
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Thomas Mills Hinkle
* URL : https://github.com/GourmandRecipeManager/gourmand
* License : GPL-2
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 17 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat spake thusly:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> A copy and paste from the NEW file is certainly useless.
>
> If the NEW file provides informatio
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 16 Apr 2006, Christian Marillat uttered the following:
>
>> Here is the relevant policy :
>>
>> , | Changes in the Debian version of the package should be
>> briefly explained in the Debian changelog
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:24 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
>> You are wrong. I've orphaned all my GNOME packages with the right entry
>> in the Debian changelog. read again.
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debia
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le dimanche 16 avril 2006 à 19:12 +0200, Christian Marillat a écrit :
>> Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > Christian,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2006, Christian Marillat
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian,
>
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
>> time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package i
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 12:02:42PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > * Christian Marillat:
>> >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Christian Marillat:
>
>> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Where are you reading that ?
>
> An upstream change is a change to the Debian package, too, and listing
> them is expressly allowed
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Christian Marillat:
>
>> Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
>> time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
>> native package the upstrea
Package: libgtk2.0-0
Version: 2.8.17-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.4
Hi,
Apparently you don't understand (or don't care), because this is the second
time I file the same bug report (#344125), but as this package isn't a
native package the upstream changelog should not be here.
If I
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10540 March 1977, Christian Marillat wrote:
>
>>> Contrast rte, where the ftpmasters told Marillat exactly what he needed to
>>> remove to get the package in Debian, and he didn't do it, and declared that
>&
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> aj@azure.humbug.org.au:
[...]
> Contrast rte, where the ftpmasters told Marillat exactly what he needed to
> remove to get the package in Debian, and he didn't do it, and declared that
> he would keep uploading it. Leaving *that* in limbo is tota
ial packages
>> in unstable make them official ?
>
> I don't think we need more packages maintained by Christian Marillat.
Moron are still here in 2006. Happy new year...
christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ial packages
>> in unstable make them official ?
>
> I don't think we need more packages maintained by Christian Marillat.
Same apply for you...
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 10:54:25AM +0100, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> No issues for this package. I simply did these packages because this is
>> more fast to me, instead of waiting for an
Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is already a libgpod0 package on Christian Marillat's archive, so I
> guess there must be an issue regarding this package's relation with debian.
No issues for this package. I simply did these packages because this is
more fast to me, instead of
Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:34:51PM +0200, Vedran Furac wrote:
>> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be packaged? Why are only ffmpeg -dev in
>> debian: http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/ffmpeg.html?
>
> Only ffmpeg-dev is in Debian as ffmpeg upstream recom
Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Package already in Debian : gstreamer0.8-ffmpeg
>
> Ops, then it should be closed.
>
> Btw. why then mencoder, can't be pa
Vedran Furac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 11:02 +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
[...]
> - note that there is software that probably can't be packaged:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=203211
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:55:30PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> * Chris Cheney
>>
>> | Its all encumbered, there is a separate organization MPEG-LA that
>> | strictly deals with the licensing. It is quite surprising to me that
>> | ffmpeg was allowe
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mark Howard wrote:
>> galeon - GNOME web browser for advanced users
>> Changes:
>> galeon (1.3.7.20030825-1) experimental; urgency=low
>> .
>>* New CVS Checkout
>>* Moved to experimental - galeon is not yet stable enough for a Debian
>>
Sebastian Rittau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 05:36:22PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote:
>
>> General
>> Debian
>> 1 project
>>10 architectures
>> 100 countries
>> 1000 maintainers
>> 1 packages
>>10 bug fixed
>> 100 million
Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This one time, at band camp, Christian Marillat said:
[...]
>> Yes, I know, but this user said that x-terminal-emulator is configured
>> to xterm and when he call a bsdgames menu enties a dialog box said that
>> gnome-ter
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 10:53:28PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > The cause of the bug is essentially the lack of gnome-terminal in
>> > testi
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 07:32:28AM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> reassign 199197 bsdgames
>>
>> This bug isn't a gnome-terminal bug.
>
> By the same token, how can you pretend it is a bsdgames related bug ?
le bugs about (c) and (d), but it needs manual checking.
[...]
>Christian Marillat (marillat at debian.org)
> gnome-panel
> gnome-themes
You can remove these two packages.
Christian
Scott Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> The maintainer of gdm doesnt want to upload it till some key components
> build on all archs. Basically he doesnt want to leave certain
> archs(which he uses) without a gdm. Also I believe he is one of the FTP
This is false because even if the l
Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> And yes, I am in trouble, most of the packages that ITP (mostly video
> related) depend on lame.
Marc ask in -legal.
Christian
Marc Leeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are you aware that ffmpeg need lame ?
> yes and no:
> yes I am aware of that
> and
> no not "need"
> --enable-mp3lame) mp3lame="yes"
> (the default is "no")
But you will lose a lot of fonctionnalities. This is the main reason
I've never did an IT
http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net/
> * License : LGPL
> Description : FFmpeg Streaming Multimedia System
Are you aware that ffmpeg need lame ?
Christian
$ dlocate -s libffmpeg0
Package: libffmpeg0
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: libs
Installed-Size: 552
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> the primary runtime.
> ltdl needs them at runtime.
>
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> the primary runtime.
> ltdl needs them at runtime.
and librep9 too.
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:23:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[...]
> Christian Marillat decided to recompile libgnome against
> libgdk-imlib2, and libpng3, so some parts of gnome1 are recompiled
> against libpng3.
> And more ABI breaking her
>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Then i'll rebuild gnome-help and my other packages who depends on imlib
>> against the new imlib. This will take 2 hours, and the problem is gone.
> Yes, but until that happens, gnome-help is broken.
> It would be nice if you fixed
>> "MS" == Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 10:46:51PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
>> libgnomecanvas will be uploaded tomorrow with libgnomeprintui and
>> libgnomeui
> Great! Now let's see, I think libb
>> "MS" == Martin Sjögren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm starting to port my Gnome programs to Gnome 2, and was a bit stumped
> when there was lots of Gnome 2 packages missing from unstable. The ones I
> found right now were libbonoboui and libgnomecanvas, but I'm sure there
> are others missin
>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:37:17PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
>> See Colin's answer. Change the library soname and shlibs. This will
>> solve this bug.
> It's a reasonable tr
>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> The fact remains that we cannot change the linkage of the library
> NOR of applications piecemeal. The changes must be coordinated.
> In the absence of a transition plan, I see no reason to introduce
> instability in GNOME by chang
>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...]
>> I really want to know why recompiling gdk-imlib1 is too hard ?
> Recompiling isn't hard. Managing the transition
reassign 128377 gdk-imlib1
thanks
>> "SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> reassign 128377 gnome-help
> thanks
> Hi Folks,
> GNOME's imlib1 library is linked with libpng2, and nobody
> knows how to gracefully handle the change from libpng2-->libpng3
> http://lists.debian.org
>> "CS" == Carlos Sousa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd just like to know if there are any plans to compile the new HP jis
> support into the gs package any time soon. I believe the debian SOHO
> user base using HP printers would benefit from the enhanced printing
> capabilities this driver prov
>> "a" == amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Craig Dickson dijo:
>> Jeff Lightfoot wrote:
>> > I think libzvt2 is the culprit. A downgrade of this package removed the
>> > 2 tabs problem.
>>
>> Downgrading to libzvt2_1.4.1.2-8 fixed the problem for me too.
> Should I reasign it or just let Ch
"MH" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Is it _really_ that hard to get debhelper 3 for potato?
I did a backport 3 months ago (3.0.31). Only a little bug, you need to call
dh_perl with -d.
Except that, I never received any "bug report"
http://marillat.free.fr/dists/stable/m
"AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> But avifile need lame to encode sound no ?
> Yes, if you want mp3-Encoding.
> I see that it links against libvorbis, so perhaps sometime it'll
> be possible to use vorbis for soundcompression.
No, vcr only works with lame.
Chri
>>>> "AM" == Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 02:57:05PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>>> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that
>>> OpenDivX is not DFSG compatible.
>>
>&
"GS" == Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Yes. Read legal archive:
>>
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200101/threads.html#00027
> While reading that discussion I do get the impression that OpenDivX is not
> DFSG compatible.
Yes, And this is why I
"EVB" == Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200101/msg02634.html,
>> I
>> guess.
> IIUC, this message refers to using codecs from microsoft.com, while the
> divx4linux library provides equivalent,free codecs.
> I
"SH" == Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Christian, please make the NMU. It would be nice if the package is
> working now.
> If you are _really_ kind, put
> Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> as maintainer in changelog/control, send the packages to me, and
>
>>>> "CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> >>>> "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > for me the dhelp package does no
"MH" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
[...]
> Is there a tool to generate an override file that simply contains the
> section/subsection/priority settings from the packages in the archive?
Replace the override file name by /dev/null
Christian
"JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
> for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because of the problem
> described in bug reports 109207, 109849, 110411, 110433, 110538,
> 111044, 112614, and 112659. My question is, does the package work for
> anybody at all? Is
"JG" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Were they empty when the package was removed, or only after it was
> purged? If the latter, then at the moment, you'll have to remove them
> manually in your postrm:
> rmdir /etc/sound/events 2>/dev/null || true
Or rmdir -p --ignor
"JG" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Were they empty when the package was removed, or only after it was
> purged? If the latter, then at the moment, you'll have to remove them
> manually in your postrm:
> rmdir /etc/sound/events 2>/dev/null || true
> etc. There is cu
Hi,
Why dpkg don't remove empty directories in /etc when purging ?
It is a dpkg bug ?
I received these bugs :
112513 /etc/sound/events
112995 /etc/gnome
112994 /etc/gnome
Hi,
In the excuses file a see a lot of :
Unsatisfiable Depends: libesd-alsa0 (>= 0.2.22-4)
Which is exactly the problem with libesd-alsa ?
I don't see any serious/grave/critical bug report.
Christian
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: librte0
Version : 0.3.1
Upstream Author : Iñaki García Etxebarria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://zapping.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Real Time Encoder
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-09-18
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: docbook-utils
Version : 0.6.9
Upstream Author : Eric Bischoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://download.sourceforge.net/pub/mirrors/kde/devel/docbook/SOURCES/
* License : GPL
"SH" == Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, fellow Debian developers !
Hi,
> dhelp was recently orphaned. IMHO a online help is quite a good idea,
> but the code hasn't touched quite a while.
> I ported the source code from db1 to db2, which is definitely needed
> to make
"TFH" == Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Branden Robinson
> | Upstream Author : Jean-Pierre Demailly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | * URL : http://frmas.free.fr/li_1.htm
> | * License : GPL
> Hmm, I cannot find any license for the package, am I not looking at
"ASH" == Andres Seco Hernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think bugs.debian.org/wnpp reports correctly the list of packages.
Yes, but a search in wnpp pages was more easy.
Christian
"MEM" == Marcelo E Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Nicolas SABOURET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Just to inform that the web page devel/wnpp still doesn't work. I don't
>> know wether sby is dealing with that already or not.
> The WNPP pages use the LDAP frontend to the BTS, whic
"LdS" == Laurent de Segur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> Actually, from stable to testing, I got a blocker with gnome-help package.
> The install wouldn't let me go any further and I had to remove this
> particular package from the selection just to be able to finish it up. The
"DS" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
DS> More to the point, what did you find wrong with my solution?
This is Monday syndrome, I've misread you post :-(
I agree with your solution.
Christian
"SMR" == Steve M Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SMR> Hi Christian & Dale,
Hi,
[...]
SMR> If Dale has agreed to do move the docs (either to -dev or to -doc),
SMR> that seems to me to answer the bug report. I don't understand what
SMR> question Christian's posting to -devel is supposed
"DS" == Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
DS> I can be convinced on either count. How would you feel about my presenting
DS> this issue to the "developers" at large, with you and I agreeing to follow
DS> the concensus of the group?
>>
>> Go ahead.
DS> At this point that seems
"JB" == Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Ha, somebody understand me :)
JB> In which case, it's perfectly reasonable to just leave the bug open
JB> and not fix it. But don't close it. And do forward it upstream.
Already done.
Christian
"GM" == GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It is possible to stop all Cc ?
Christian
"JCGS" == Jose C Garcia Sogo writes:
JCGS> Hello!
Hi,
[...]
JCGS> Reading a little more, it seems like libglade must be built against
JCGS> new libgnome, and after doing this, libgnome-dev will be fixed, is this
JCGS> right? But, I think this doesn't mean that the libgnome-dev bug can
"TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
TB> This is a *USER* feature, not an API. No programming is going on, not
TB> even editing text files with obscure hidden customization thingies,
TB> just straightforward use of a straightforward feature.
This is a bug fix from upst
"CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CW> Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Programs shouldn't gratuitously break configurations which worked.
>> When woody is released, and people upgrade en masse to it, they will
>> want their configurations to carry on working.
CW> In
"TB" == Thomas Bushnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
TB> The current bug (94684) he said "I can do nothing if upstream author
TB> changes their API". Well, this has many problems:
TB> 1) Upstream author didn't change an API, they changed a direct user
TB>issue.
False.
TB> 2) He
"WWT" == Wesley W Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
WWT> Anyways, here's the easy fix. In configure.in find:
[...]
WWT> Anyways, you have a fix that works now. Please try it yourself and let me
WWT> know whether or not it works out. Oh, I had to tweak all the Build-Depends
WWT> to
"ZK" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
ZK> I've just placed there the latest version of avifile
ZK> (surprisingly the one in CVS is older)
ZK> Anyway for now I've used the name of the tar archive so for
ZK> the dpkg this archive looks older (0.53-1)
ZK> I'm not sure if I
"UH" == Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
UH> On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 01:59:21PM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote:
>> Does anyone have any ideas on
>> this, or has it been done already?
UH> Hi.
UH> I guess vsound is what you're lokking for...
UH> Should be listed on Freshmeat...
Any idea
"ZK" == Zdenek Kabelac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ZK> Hi everyone
Hi,
ZK> After a while there is finaly version which looks stable enough for me,
ZK> so there are new packages of this program available here
ZK> http://master.debian.org/~kabi/libaviplay_20010103-1_i386.deb
ZK> http://mast
"MM" == Michael Meding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
[...]
MM> that was really funny. I am still laughing. Of course a quick search in
there
MM> revealed nothing poping up for cdda. But I did the search before I posted
to
MM> the list.
MM>
"MM" == Michael Meding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> Hi all,
Hi,
MM> in which paket do I find the desired files ?
Here :
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Christian
"JR" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> We need to wait ? If yes how-many time ?
JR> Hmmm. That's not an easy question. Send him another mail, and upload a fixed
JR> package. Then wait for response :)
JR> --
JR> Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Null
>>>> "JR" == Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JR> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:10:23PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> I intent to adopt this package.
>>
>> This package isn't orphaned, but Steve Haslam is MIA since more one
Hi,
I intent to adopt this package.
This package isn't orphaned, but Steve Haslam is MIA since more one year.
I'll upload a new release before the new millennium.
Christian
"JG" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
>>
>> Send-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JG> Whoa! What packages understand this, and where is it documented?
Sorry this is a error.
The right place for this is in:
/usr/share/bug/$package/cont
"PT" == Peter Teichman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
PT> This solution looks like the best one. I'll start rebuilding our
PT> packages immediately.
Don't forget to put this field in debian/control:
Send-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christian
"TK" == Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CD> Hello,
CD> The Nautilus deb depends on "libgtkhtml4 (>= 0.6.1-1)".
CD> ^
CD> I can't find a package that provides that anywhere. I'm wondering
CD> about that '4' above the caret. Could you advise?
TK> It's in Incoming, http://incoming.de
"FB" == Franklin Belew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
FB> This is actually a bug in libzvt2, I have submitted a patch to libzvt2 to
FB> comply with debian xterm specs. Hopefully the maintainer will apply this
FB> and upload to potato soon
I've make a more friendly patch for libzvt2.
S
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > libgnobjc or something to that effect.
> > I still don't see this package anywhere, I am either overlooking it
> > or it is not packaged?
>
> I'm sure it's packaged. Don't remember the exact name (do
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Now that GNOME 1.0.40 is out for beta testing, I had a look at what needs
> > to be updated in potato.
> > Needless to say it would be great to have an up to date GNOME in potato
> > before the freeze...
>
> Of course ! But I'll need some help. Gnoe
Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's at http://master.debian.org/~mdorman/gnome-libs-1.0.16/. I'm
> >uploading it now, and my DSL line doesn't give me infinite bandwidth, so
> >you might wait five or ten minutes.
>
>
95 matches
Mail list logo
