Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:17:23AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> > So in summary, if yo
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 02:17:23AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Falk Hueffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > So in summary, if you don't care about portability to 64-bit windows,
> > assuming sizeof(void*) == sizeof(long) is just fine.
>
> Unless you comp
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:06:06PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> long is not appropriate to save pointers, you need to use
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 02:39:26PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:15:32PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Henning Makholm wrote:
> >
> > > Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
> > > investigated the warnings
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Another related bug type that I found lurking in my packages when I
> investigated the warnings in this list, is trying to format a size_t
> value with a %u or %d format string, which will break if size_t is 64
> bits (unless the actual number is small and it is the last a
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:58:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 11:53:24PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote:
> > The others are trivially fixable; of these, the one in libavcodec is already
> > fixed in CVS. I've committed the rest (they're basically s/int/long/) and am
> > forward
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Falk Hueffner a écrit :
>> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>>On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
>> On Alpha the problem is:
>> {standard input}: Assembler
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On arm, ia64 and alpha the glibc fails to build with gcc-4.1.
On Alpha the problem is:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:341: Error: macro requires $at register while noat in effect
{standard input}:374: Error: macro requires $at
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:51:25PM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>> Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> > * the release architecture must be publicly available to buy new
>
>> > Avoids a situ
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * the release architecture must be publicly available to buy new
>
> Avoids a situation where Debian is keeping an architecture alive.
I don't understand this. What is the problem with Debian is keeping an
architecture alive? What problem are you tryi
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> -int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, uint32_t index, char ** result,
>> +int mailpop3_retr(mailpop3 * f, unsigned int index, char ** result,
>> size_t * result_len);
>
> That is, 'uint32_t' was changed to 'unsigned int'.
>
> Does
Marcelo E. Magallon writes:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 10:14:15PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
>
> > > occurs when you have for example an ev56 library in lib/ev56, and a
> > > ev67 CPU. Then the loader looks in lib/ev67 and then falls back to
> > > lib. Since glibc is very carefully undocumented i
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, eh, I'm not convinced lintian is correct here in complaining,
> I'm a bit unsure. Lintian has warned for any hardlinks for a long time,
> but is it really bad to have them? Having them across different
> directories might cause problems whe
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 13.01.05 02:01:11:
> At Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:27:28 +0100,
> Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > IIRC, alpha does not define any hwcaps.
> >
> > There's a patc
GOTO Masanori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcelo E. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mesa upstream uses -mcpu=ev5 -mieee on alpha. Is that ok? Where does
>> this belong into? /usr/lib/ev5?
>
> IIRC, alpha does not define any hwcaps.
There's a patch for this, which works fine, but wasn
Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > E2tools is a simple set of GPL'ed utilities to read, write, and
> > manipulate files in an ext2/ext3 filesystem.
>
> please excuse my ignorance - what would be the advantage of these
> tools over the core file utilities which use the VFS layer?
You do
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 12:32:59AM +0100, Millis Miller wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A; reported 2003-06-27
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: email
>
> I understand that email is the name of the upstream client but I'd
>
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oddly, it looks like GCC doesn't currently ever generate
> 486-specific instructions; they are only (currently) of benefit to
> assembly programmers. (Hmm... maybe I should see if there's an
> enhancement opportunity to GCC there.)
I have a patch fl
Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 19:08:38 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sami Haahtinen) wrote:
>
> > Or, can rsync sync binary files?
> > hmm.. this sounds like something worth implementing..
>
> rsync can, but the problem is with a compressed stream if you insert
> or al
Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be a great idea to have source dependencies. I compile all
> sources on my debian mirror and most fail because of missing
> files. One then has to search the package and install that before
> compiling again.
A very simple way to improve in this ar
opying over
the whole .xssession? Maybe a .window-manager? I think that would be
useful, since there are many people who insist on a particular window
manager, but don't want to change anything else.
Falk Hueffner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hello,
I intend to apply as a maintainer (as soon as I find somebody to scan
my passport ;) and package:
- ras (http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/nc/)
Ras is a small utility that adds m extra files to a set of n files,
such that the contents of the n original files can be regenerated from
any n of th
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As maintainer of gzip for Debian, I do not agree that having gzip
> > fork a bzip2 when it sees a bzip2 magic number is a good idea. If
> > we want to support multiple compression engines, I believe thi
Joel Klecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 14:16 +0200 1998-04-18, Brederlow wrote:
> >I think it would be a good idea to teach tar to unpack bzip2 files via
> >the -z option, just as if it would be gzip. Alternativly one could
> >teach gzip to use bzip2 for .bz2 archives or teach dpkg to disti
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 01:01:46 +0200, Marcus Brinkmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's related to the fact that egcs does exception handling - add
>> -fno-exceptions to your CFLAGS, and you'll get a shorter binary.
>
>I think this is not the right way to think of C++ programming. If you don't
>use
plans about this in 2.x versions?
Falk Hueffner
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo
