On Monday 31 October 2005 09:54 am, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > For the first time over the past months, we are now able to get a
> > comprehensive look at just which packages are involved in this
> > transition -- around 300 source packages that need
On Saturday 01 October 2005 02:49 pm, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 the mental interface of
>
> Paul TBBle Hampson told:
> > On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 02:43:32PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 the mental interface of
> > > Steve Langasek told:
> > >
> > >
On Thursday 01 September 2005 06:42 pm, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:11:30AM -0700, Allyn, MarkX A wrote:
> > I have also noticed tickets submitted to the bug facility that are
> > spam. Can that facility be configured so that if the format (package
> > name, version, etc) is no
For the record, bug #318098 is related to the gcc transition - the packages
that will get removed if jackd is installed are most of kde. A new kde
could not be uploaded to change the dependency to the new libjack0.100.0-0
because of the chain of dependencies that had to make the gcc transition
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 06:56 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
>well, the fixes take forever to get to testing
That is because they need to go through testing and bug fixes in unstable.
>so while testing seems like a good idea in general it doesn't seem to
> be very appealing in its current incar
On Wednesday 27 July 2005 10:10 pm, Steve Langasek wrote:
> But ok, yes, that is an option; let's spell the options out completely:
>
> - Don't ship .la files in the -dev package; don't depend on any other
> -dev packages except those whose headers you need. This gives optimal
> results for shared
On Sunday 24 July 2005 11:14 am, Miernik wrote:
> Does libwmf0.2-7 has to depend on gsfonts ?
>
> I think that dependency should be changed to Recommends, because there
> are perfectly fine uses of libwmf0.2-7 where gsfonts are not needed at
> all. For example the wv package uses this library, and
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 06:31 pm, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> reopen 209891
> thanks
>
> If spam e-mail is going to start closing our Bugs in the BTS then we
> should
> start thinking about implementing authentication checks in the BTS...
> like
> for example: do not allow control mes
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 08:25 am, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
...
> So they expect something to be available without depending on a
> package that provides it? Sounds like a bug.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ended after the text quoted above, without the usual signature describing how
to unsubscr
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 07:56 am, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2005-05-04 13:27:38, schrieb Mario Fux:
> > Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2005 13.08 schrieb Michelle Konzack:
> >
> > Morning
> >
> > > > On Wed, 4 May 2005, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > >
> > > apt-cache showsrc knoda recall kexi
> >
> > Se
On Friday 29 April 2005 06:50 am, David Mandelberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 03:53 -0500, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > As far as spam harvester are concerned, they can just subscribe to the
> > mailing-lists to get the mail headers.
>
> I think if they subscribe to the mailing list and use it for
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 05:33 pm, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > Usually NEW-queue was handled by the date of first upload of some
> > > package. After tracking of debian-bugs and/or debian-wnpp mailing
> > > lists last days
On Sunday 20 March 2005 05:42 am, Andrea Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
> I have noticed a messy situation in BTS,
> regarding my source package libppd (*)
>
> my source package has this web page in BTS
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libppd
> where you see there are 4 bugs listed (resolv
On Saturday 26 February 2005 02:45 am, sean finney wrote:
> hi,
>
> i'm maintaining a source package that produces two binary packages.
> however, one of the packages is built from a seperately distributed (same
> author, same website, but different tarball and versioning scheme)
> tarball.
>
> so
On Monday 24 January 2005 07:40 pm, Jack wrote:
> PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM CALL WAVE
>
> JAMES H. SCOTT, SR.
> 618 355 0976
>
>
> PeoplePC Online
> A better way to Internet
> http://www.peoplepc.com
We can't remove you from callwave, but you can remove yoursel
On Tuesday 04 January 2005 05:58 pm, Neil McGovern wrote:
> Recently, I did have a box rooted. This was due to a user running phpbb
> on the system, without me knowing, despite the policy of no software
> without clearance from me.
My I ask, how did the attacker get root? Did the user have root a
On Sunday 05 December 2004 08:25 pm, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:21:04PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > On 05-Dec-04, 09:07 (CST), Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:45:56AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> > > > On 05-Dec-04, 04:55
On Thursday 02 December 2004 04:01 am, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 02:40:47 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > John was taking Manoj's reasoning to the limit.
>
> Yup. Arguing by the extremes, while intriguing to some, is
> extremely jejune.
>
> manoj
> --
> "I H
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 06:46 am, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041201 12:40]:
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 22:25 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:17:33AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 11:04 +, Steve McIntyre
On Wednesday 01 December 2004 04:59 pm, Brian May wrote:
> > "Petter" == Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Petter> "connection refused" generate a support request from the
> Petter> user, and increases the load on the support organisation.
> Petter> The users will
On Wednesday 23 April 2003 06:17 pm, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mer 23/04/2003 à 22:23, Josh Metzler a écrit :
> > Shuttle:/home/josh# apt-get -s install libpng3
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following extra
The new libpng3 (1.2.5.0-1) renames libpng12-0-dev to libpng12-dev, which
seems to be intentional on the part of the new maintainer. I have a number
of kde development packages which depend on libpng12-0-dev, though, and so
will be removed if I upgrade libpng3.
Transcript:
Shuttle:/home/josh#
22 matches
Mail list logo
