on the server-side.
The last time I looked into this (although I do admit it was a while
ago), there were still a large number of boune messages that looked
liked this. I can't forsee this having changed.
Pasc
(with his non-razor-bladed listmaster hat on)
--
Pascal Hakim
his?
> So it would be possible to mark mails as spam without going
> to the website of the archive.
What happens if someone fakes a message-id?
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
> I don't know how to fix it, maybe creating a po file with the
> translation of "in Brazil", "in France", "in Comores", ... but thus
> duplicating many entries.
>
> Maybe filing a bug against www.debian.org c
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 00:33 +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> >> As in once you confirmed one subscription the next one doesn't ask
> >> anymore? Sort of greylisting?
> >>
> >> Sounds good.
> >
> > It should always ask for confirmation unless someone has specifically
> > made the decision tha
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 06:25 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Don Armstrong]
> > What has actually been discussed is automatically subscribing
> > submitters to the bug report unless some special header/pseudo-header
> > is added to prevent that.
>
> Sounds good. But since this information was alr
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:30 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > Now ... how hard would it be to add 'submit-subscribe@' support?
> > Most of the time, when I submit a bug report, I'd like to subscribe
> > to it. Would this be a straightforward hack?
>
> Wh
running
normal cron jobs that would have been scheduled to run otherwise, and
didn't run because the computer wasn't on.
Cheers,
Pasc (with his "I'm the anacron maintainer" hat on)
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UN
un at any other moment.
>
'lo,
Running anacron (or fcron or whatever) will make sure you run all of
cron.daily however. This is more useful than just running popcon. If
your computer is turned off, you'll be missing things like log rotation
and your locate database, as well as all yo
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 10:37:02PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:11:14PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> >>
> >> It is now possible to subscribe and unsubscribe from individual bugs
s not the same system, but it's a similar idea. Joachim was strongly
involved in getting that to work.
Cheers,
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim 0403 411 672
Do Not Bend
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
require much
> of load, mostly waiting time for the transaction. We would get to
> spamassassin quite rarely if most of people (and DD) start signing their
> submissions, and 3rd one will hit with probably 1% false positives...
>
Sending verification letters like that is a rather bad i
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 01:08:33PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > Placing a footer in list traffic is a compromise between modifying
> > messages as little as possible and trying to help people find a way
> > to get their questions
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:09:17AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > I wonder what it's rule set is.
> >
> > :0 fbw
> > * ! ^Content-Transfer-Encoding:.*base64
> > * ! ^Content-Transfer-Encoding:.*quoted-pri
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:33:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 01:25 +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 10:18:16AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > >&
> and the MUA doesn't "see" it, because it only knows to process
> > the attachments (text/plain & application/pgp-signature being 99.99%
> > of the attachments to emails on this list).
>
> > View the raw source of such a "disappearing unsub messa
gmail.com used to do that to lists.debian.org. We deliver ~300,000
emails to gmail a day. It resulted in some deliveries timing out before
they were even attempted; I'll let you imagine the rest.
Cheers,
Pasc
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 08:35 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Santiago Vila]
> > Fo
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 10:45 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's painful about it?
> >
> > It stops a lot of viruses and spam, with no false positives. What's the
> > problem?
>
> "No false positives" seems a bit optimistic.
>
> One problem I've encou
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Wouter Verhelst:
>
> > What's painful about it?
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if it already increases load on
> lists.debian.org significantly.
>
>
Not nearly as much as people who teergrub us. We can _really_ feel them.
Cheers,
Pasc
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 15:09 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Jeu 16 Juin 2005 14:33, Santiago Vila a écrit :
> > Now that we have released sarge, I would like to ask debian-admin and
> > the Project Leader to consider seriously doing something to reduce
> > the level of spam we have to receive, s
able to manipulate source
> > > packages with the tools in stable. Note, I said "manipulate", not
> > > "build".
> > >
> > Why can't you just install the unstable ones?
>
> Because we don't run unstable on our project
I've just created the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. You can
subscribe from http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/
Cheers,
Pasc
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 13:50 +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:21:30AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > It really seems that such a list is need
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 12:08 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > >Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
> > >provide people with a place to d
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 14:28 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar a Ãcrit :
> > I'm strongly in favour of a lists.debian.org, and I'm sure it'll be
> > created swiftly when we choose a sane name for it.
>
> If possible, I also think that a lists.debian.org is better, and will
> und
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 10:14 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:28:48PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
> > be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
> > subscribers are
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:26 +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
>
> > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists
> > available as mbox archives.
>
> http://mbox.mewes.tv/ exists :-)
>
Heh. Nice work.
You might want to obscure those a li
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 15:09 +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:55 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > [Pascal Hakim]
> > > The reason it hasn't been done so far is not related to any technical
> > > problem. There seems to be just as many people who
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 03:03 -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 03:09:37PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > > retained by an mbox but not exposed to the web don't seem all that
> > > objectionable, especially since the web archives don't munge email
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:55 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Pascal Hakim]
> > The reason it hasn't been done so far is not related to any technical
> > problem. There seems to be just as many people who do not want the
> > mboxes to be available as people who do.
>
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 23:20 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > It would be really handy to have archives of the debian mailing lists
> > available as mbox archives.
>
> The correct solution, until someone gets around to exporting the
> mboxes, is to talk/grumble/whine about want
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 03:32 +0100, Bluefuture wrote:
>
> I'm not a debian developer, so i could not post on dda mailing list. I
> had opened many thread over this months on debian-qa debian-devel about
> dehs issues. The only reply are:
>
If you're not a developer and you want to post on d-d-a,
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 13:35 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> ClÃment Stenac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm interested in maintainership of PovRay.
> >
> > I'm going to try to update the package to the latest upstream version
> > and to work on some of the bugs
>
> That would be cool. At least one
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:55:54PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Pfft, constitution. Like that'll ever hold up in court.
Maybe they could put it in the preamble?
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim
Do Not Bend
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:50:44AM +0100, Martin Godisch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Who can tell me, where the debian-private list archives can be found?
> Looks like they moved somewhere...
>
master:/home/debian/archive/debian-private/
Pasc
--
Pascal Hakim
ce/2004/10/msg00010.html>),
> but not in the inboxes of subscribers.
>
There appears to be a large delay in the queue at the moment. There are
a couple of mail domains/ISPs causing us some issues, so expect to
receive mail late.
For example, that message made it in 30 hours later or so.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 08:00:07AM -0600, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> > Right, just take Eray as an example (and note that the NM committee
> > agreed 100% with the DAM's decision; yet the DAM got all the blame).
>
> Indeed you're right. To me we sohuld make things more open. Let's mak
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:28:15PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > Why does a non-DD need to find
> > a DD to sign and forward the mail to dda? Why cant he sign it himself
> > and post it to the list? The message has to be approved by the moderator
> > anyway.
>
> Mail to debian-devel-announce i
36 matches
Mail list logo
