Hi,
On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 09:54:18PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> FWIW, golang-1.12 was removed from buster, because the RT think
> there're too many golang for buster[1].
there's no logic in that, and especially with the introduction of this
new feature, which the Go community has awaited f
Hello,
I just figured that Buster is, from the current POV, going to ship with
Golang 1.11. While I am new to Go, I figured that we should probably
have a newer version of Golang in Buster, as they are now doing
versioned dependencies, but only starting with 1.12 or 1.13 (not quite
sure about th
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> 4- if no commercial machine exists at a "fair price", to train the
>neural network in a reasonable amount of time, the publisher of Y
>must lend a machine to fulfill the GPL requirements.
I don't think so. Otherwis
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 04:22:23PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> My point is you shouldn't educate with lies and half-truths.
Good point. Then you get to do it the correct way. Deal?
Cheers,
--Toni++
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 10:13:52AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 11:00:38PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > link to a page suggesting free hardware over similar non-free hardware
>
> There is no such thing. There is only non-free hardware without up
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:39:12PM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Every time I need a Debian ISO, it takes me minutes to find it.
> I didn't even know, that there were an ISO with non-free firmware.
>
> There should be a beautiful ISO download page, e.g.
> https://www.debian.org/download[
Hi Harlan,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> It's been a while since we made the decision not to pull from upstream's
> git; Toni, I'd be happy to work with you on seeing if it's doable now.
I think I have a suitable package now, being as cheap as possible,
Hi,
I'm confused...
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 09:01:51PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:30:26AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> >Ifconfig has been deprecated; you should probably use "ip a show
> >dev lo" instad of the shorter and more convenient "ifconfig lo"
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:14:59PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Toni Mueller writes:
> > I found them only on PyPI. Did you find them elsewhere?
>
> We get them from releases.ansible.com. Are the docs in the tarballs in
> PyPi?
Nope, there are only man pages.
Cheers,
--Toni++
Hi!
A happy new year, everyone!
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 01:07:44PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Unfortunately, we don't build ansible off of the git repository, but
> rather from the released tarballs.
I found them only on PyPI. Did you find them elsewhere?
> It's been a while since
Hi Evgeni,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:44:50PM +0100, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:58:02AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > documentation. This package aims to supply the documentation in HTML
> > form offline, so one should not need to go to the aoupstream webs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller
* Package name: ansible-doc
Version : 2.2.0.0-1
Upstream Author : RedHat
* URL : http://www.ansible.com/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: HTML, JavaScript
Description : Documentation for Ansible
Hi,
I'm working on packaging for a -doc package and find, that the original
code generated, in this case by Sphinx, contains unwanted references to
fonts hosted outside, eg. at Google, and other unwanted stuff. For the
bulk of the JavaScript, I found Debian packages that allow me to create
the d
Hi Marc,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:54:39AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:04:06 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
> wrote:
> >On 25 November 2014 at 02:22, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> [13] http://0pointer.net/public/systemd-nluug-2014.pdf
> >This seems pretty interesting.
>
> Inde
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:32:40PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> In the world in which BSD software is linked with LibreSSL and the license
> exceptions have not been changed to allow OpenSSL-derived software, now
> (due to the way that Debian applies this rule transitively) GPL software
> can't li
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:43:27AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > That turns smaller adjustments in applications into
> > developing entirely different interfaces for each application, while
> > GnuTLS itself still lacks a lot of features.
>
> Do you have any reference for this? I have not foll
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:08:01PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:22:49PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > OpenSSL was part of OpenBSD before they created the LibreSSL fork, so
> > how isn't OpenSSL part of the OpenBSD track record?
>
> it is in
Hi Jeroen,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:22:49PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> At Sat, 12 Jul 2014 14:46:45 +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > Ok, but for whatever reason, they have an imho not as shiny track
> > record, as has OpenBSD. Which is no wonder, given all the revelations
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 11:52:24AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/12/2014 08:46 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > As libressl is currently under
> > heavy development, it is imho not to be expected to have that stable ABI
> > you are asking for.
>
> Well, I
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 07:43:44AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 12, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > * Package name: libressl
> I am highly doubtful at best.
in which respect, and why?
> What are your plans exactly?
My plan is to first build the package(s) and upload
Hi Kurt,
[ I have trimmed the Cc list - we are all on devel@, anyway, right? ]
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 02:15:13PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:53:45PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 01:25:47PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > >
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller
* Package name: libressl
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : The OpenBSD project, the OpenSSL project et al.
* URL : http://www.libressl.org/
* License : BSD, OpenSSL, SSLeay, Public Domain.
Programming Lang
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 04:07:24PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> BTW, it'd be nice to have a backport of Jitsi. Not sure how much work
> that would be though (there must be lots of java dependencies...).
I recently installed 2.5.5190-1 on Wheezy without much trouble, but
imho, the operational i
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 08:44:30PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> ...
> forcing the rest of the world to conform to our worldview. One
> desktop environment, and an awful one at that, dictating the
> init system we use is a complete farce. Debian is a lot bigger
> than GNOME, and if we have to, I
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:12:59AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > This blogpost is months old but it makes some interesting reflections:
> > http://www.pappp.net/?p=969
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/11554768395172769
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 05:15:25PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> If both Ubuntu and Gentoo would just go with the rest of the community
> and accept systemd, we wouldn't have to bother whether udev runs
> without systemd or not.
I would highly prefer a system where I can take small b
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:09:51AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 11:12 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > The full thread is here:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2262
> This thread was originally about udev, yet everyone is starting again the
> systemd / ups
Hi,
while working on scim, we found that there's a problem that appears to stem from
libclutter-imcontetext-0.1-dev apparently not being multi-arch'ed. I quote from
an email by Tz-Huan:
-- cut
The scim try to figure out the module directory of clutter-imcontext
in these ways:
*
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 08:41:07AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> I think this is approaching the problem from the wrong end. Instead of
> preserving the status quo and asking oracles to predict the future we
> should have better means of _removing_ software that has proven to be
> inferior of
Hi,
today I received an email from the FTP masters that a pacakge that is
highly relevant to me, has been pulled from Debian. I understand that
most folks are now looking at that ibus stuff (which is imho not ready
for prime time, yet), but would like to understand better how a package
with only
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:53:50PM +0200, Peter Pöschl wrote:
> Seems you overlooked this:
>
> > Debian Unstable 64-bit 5.5.23-2
I just tried on my 32bit machine, and didn't get in in some 50.000
attempts. Also, the squeeze versions are listed under "unaffected",
which is what reduces the s
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 02:26:23PM +0200, Florian Reitmeir wrote:
> Norbert Preining wrote:
> >is this only me or do I have the feeling that we are going down
> >the trench with Gnome?
> > ...
> >Is this a joke? Are we going to release that in June/July/whenever?
> i use gnome too, and for me its
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 06:34:57AM +0300, Serge wrote:
> 2012/6/3 Toni Mueller wrote:
> >> First, there can be rather large session directory, you probably don't
> >> want ~365595 files to be always eating your RAM.
> > Well, I much rather want that, or st
Hi Bernhard,
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 01:51:33PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Toni Mueller [120603 11:41]:
> > Since we obviously can't agree on *how* the service is to be run, one
> > could just ask the user, eg., in the case of a printing service:
> The print serv
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 05:11:16PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> 2012/6/2 Toni Mueller wrote:
> > Eg. web application's session data very frequently goes there, and/or
> > the sysadmin wants it to go onto a tmpfs.
>
> First, there can be rather large session directory, you pro
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:21:02AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> Enabling services on external interfaces by default is indeed a bug, IMO,
> especially things like SSH, DHCP, SMTP or Bind (which has a long history of
> security problems).
SSH is imho the one exeption to the rule, provided it h
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 08:21:34AM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Aaron Toponce [120602 16:26]:
> > However, I am calling into question the validity of starting a service by
> > default post-install. I think it introduces security concerns, possible
> > headaces on the local LAN, and just un
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 07:00:52PM +0300, Serge wrote:
> Well, nobody named the benefits yet. Just the problems. There were a
Well, I named one on 28th of May. Did you read it?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Hi Thomas,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 07:33:26PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > All the complaints about /tmp as tmpfs come down to one simple issue:
> > The size of the tmpfs isn't chosen well. It would be more constructive
> > to find a better heuristic for the size there.
>
> No. The complain i
Hi Phil,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 07:49:03PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> The Debian approach has always been to not install anything that you
> don't intend to use.
I have brought up this topic in the past, too. Summary: I often do want
the Debian-packaged software on my systems, but use it enti
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 08:26:52AM -0400, Weldon Goree wrote:
> at some point). Much better developers than me seem to have formed
> this opinion too (cf browsers' behavior while it waits for you to tell
> it what to do with an unknown content-type: it's a disk-based pipe to
> whatever program you
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 05:58:55PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Charles Plessy dixit:
> >upstream source moved to GitHub, and we would like to try to maintain the
> >Debian package there as well.
>
> This is not a good idea: http://mako.cc/writing/hill-free_tools.html
MUCH seconded. Thanks for
Hi,
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 02:22:24AM +0300, Serge wrote:
> What's a temporary file? Really, why would applications temporarily store
> its data in a file? They do that to *free some memory*. Placing those files
> back to memory renders the whole process of writing the file useless.
> If the fil
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 03:56:25PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Hopefully you've got the build-dependencies too. Which, if the source packages
> were split off into other packages, you'd then pull in.
Being able to read the source code can often get you quite far already,
but yes, usually, I want a
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 05:53:11PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Russell Coker wrote:
> > Would it be possible to have somewhere on the Debian servers for storing
> > such
> > files so that they can be referenced in a README file or something rather
> > than
> > sent
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:34:39AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So to use the image you need either a DVD or a USB stick, and if you're
> using a write-once DVD you're perhaps wasting the unused space; but the
> download time and install footprint are still kept low and in the range of
> wh
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:53:25PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some
> > form?
> Ola Lundqvist had plans to do this in an
> OpenVZ-hosted repository.
Sounds goo
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 04:23:27PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> This reminds me: is anyone going to bring back vserver or openvz in some
I'm for having openvz back, then.
Can we have this in a separate thread, please?
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@l
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 09:56:17AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> packaging and security issues and is because we need N independent
> installations per server for different groups that can vary separately and
That's one reason why packaged versions of web apps are quite often
useless at my workpla
Hi,
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:26:26AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> The value is the same as for most packages: it's easy to install and
> easy to upgrade (I assume; I don't use Wordpress). Yes, the expected
if someone in Debian would want to make that effort, I'd say that
Wordpress and the li
On 03/17/2012 01:40 PM, Philip Hands wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:23:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> NAME=package-binary-file
>> DESC="package daemon description"
>>
>> [ -e . /usr/share/sysv-lib/debsysv-lib ] && debsysv-init-lib $@
>
> I'm happy to help with that ... although, I doubt we'r
On 02/18/2012 11:48 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> What about a debhelper script that receives an URL (or set of mirror URLs)
> and
> a SHA1 and does the download and check?
If you're going this way, try to peek at the *BSD's ports systems,
specifically their 'distinfo' files. SHA1 is not enough, imho
On 12/21/2011 11:55 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> Nowadays 100G disks are small by laptop standards and for desktops 1TB is
> about the smallest that anyone would buy.
Focussing on the desktop is the core of this - imho - misguided idea.
I'd still like to be able have a small, self-contained, Debian
On 11/21/2011 07:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Since we're theorising, rather than talking about actual users, my
> theory is that these are sold as replacements for installed systems,
> which will run the exact same software as the original - not Debian
> 7.0. It would be silly to start a new dep
Hi,
On Fri, 25.03.2011 at 14:17:06 +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> If we really want to meet the spec, we should be aiming for < 64
> characters, but that affects 98 packages and I'm not *too* bothered
> about it since testing shows no issues thus far. I'm tempted to file:
>
> * serious bugs on
Hi,
On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 11:45:05 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Screenshots on packages.d.o
> ---
>
> You may have noticed that packages.d.o now includes screenshots[1]
> with a link to a the Debian screenshots site[2]. Where a screenshot
> isn't available a "No screensh
Hi,
On Thu, 23.09.2010 at 15:13:06 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Needing an unencrypted /boot just means you have to distrust /boot after you
> lose and then regain control of your laptop.
this probably means that you have to do this everytime you've set the
device aside, or after you wake up
On Tue, 24.08.2010 at 22:12:37 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Probably you are looking for this?
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/jigdo-cd/
Yes. The link to this isn't published prominently, but I found it at
last.
Thank you!
--
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Hi,
I was under the impression that Testing installer images should be
auto-generated on a weekly basis. Now I look at
http://www.debian.org/CD/jigdo-cd/, and at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/squeeze_di_alpha1/i386/jigdo-cd/
and find that the images are all actually several months old, whi
Hi,
On Wed, 11.08.2010 at 17:48:09 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin
wrote:
> Toni Mueller wrote:
> > in debian/control, like eg.
> > Bugs-To: some...@debian.org, ...
> This is the info which IMHO belongs to PTS and should stay there.
after rethinking the issue, I agree that it
Hi,
while working on a package I'm going to sponsor, it occurred to me with
all the DD, DM and sponsoring going on, that I'd like to have a field
in debian/control, like eg.
Bugs-To: some...@debian.org, ...
to have some...@debian.org automatically subscribed to the bugs for
this package, much
Hi,
I know that I'm a bit late...
On Thu, 10.06.2010 at 17:54:28 +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> My personal preference would be to go with 4.0.
If it's one, then I opt for 4.0.
Thank you very much!
Kind regards,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller
* Package name: mysql-cluster
Version : 7.1.3
Upstream Author : Oracle
* URL : http://dev.mysql.com
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C, C++
Description : cluster-enabled version of the MySQL
Hi,
On Fri, 09.04.2010 at 19:30:43 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
> On 09/04/10 10:05, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > I suggest that updates to taxbird and its dependencies are provided via
> > volatile.
> Why do you mail -devel and not taxb...@p.d.o or the maintainer or the b
Hi,
I suggest that updates to taxbird and its dependencies are provided via
volatile.
Reason:
Users of taxbird have to comply with certain legal requirements, and
eg. Lenny's version of taxbird is unfit to create tax reports for this
year, while the version in Testing pulls in a significant num
Hi,
On Wed, 31.03.2010 at 08:46:01 +0100, Holger Levsen
wrote:
> On Dienstag, 30. März 2010, Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva wrote:
> > > squid!
> > > (Or any other normal http proxy. I don't recommend any apt-proxy
> > > solution...)
> > Can you explain why?
>
> apt-proxy had issues when I tried
On Sat, 27.02.2010 at 21:59:39 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Faidon Liambotis
> | Beyond that, I've also seen filesystem corruption when using live
> | migration and the filesystem cache hasn't been disabled -- an almost
> | undocumented directive of libvirt's XML.
> |
> | All in all, I'm
Hi,
On Mon, 08.02.2010 at 20:13:48 +0100, Marc Brockschmidt wrote:
> we wish to freeze only after the number of these bugs has dropped below
> the mark of 300. As you can see on the usual overview pages [RC-Bugs],
great decision, imho.
> Work towards fixing these bugs is greatly appreciated. W
Hi,
On Wed, 11.11.2009 at 23:46:59 +0100, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> Yes, this is one of the awkward things I find in the AGPL. If it's not
> a webapp, what then?
please see this:
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AGPLv3InteractingRemotely
It could eg. also be network file sys
Hi,
On Thu, 12.11.2009 at 12:51:56 +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 01:07:24PM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:41:31PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > >-- The code is modified to interact with the user using a network
> > > > protocol
> > > >
Hi,
On Thu, 08.10.2009 at 11:44:21 -0400, Barry deFreese
wrote:
> A few of us have been discussing the removal of sun-java6. It is
hmmm... are we really talking about sun-java_6_ and not sun-java_5_?
When I look at Sun's site, I find that Java 6 is the most current
offering they have:
htt
Hi,
On Sun, 28.12.2008 at 21:08:04 +1000, Anthony Towns
wrote:
> If you consider the same results, without the supermajority requirements
> for options 2, 3, 4 and 6, you get:
>
> Winner: Option 2: Allow Lenny to release with proprietary firmware
considering all the problems around this p
Hi,
On Sat, 15.11.2008 at 08:49:12 +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> On some systems like OpenBSD, all those users are starting with
> underscore to avoid collision with real users. On Debian, I have never
> seen this, even for packages that comes from OpenBSD (like openntpd
> which
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Owner: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-webunit
Version : 1.3.8
Upstream Author : Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mechanicalcat.net/tech/webunit/
* License : MIT
Prog
Hi Florian,
On Mon, 24.12.2007 at 09:41:22 +0100, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Turbo Fredriksson:
> > (and claims that this makes Qmail wide open for spams is rubish - it's
> > only if/when configured incorrectly that this becomes a problem)
>
> How can you configure DJB qmail s
Hi,
On Mon, 24.12.2007 at 07:29:58 +0100, Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> - all that send receipt on acceptance/delivery, reject at SMTP etc (and
> claims that this makes Qmail wide open for spams is rubish - it's only
> if/when configured incorrectly that this becomes a problem)
Hi,
On Sun, 23.12.2007 at 20:17:16 +0100, Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> There are times where qmail-ldap is to much (on hosts where a smart host
> is used for example) and there I use the 'simple' qmail package. On mail
> servers, I use the qmail-ldap package...
why, just set c
Hi,
On Fri, 21.12.2007 at 11:14:01 -0800, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the version that is proposed to be packaged patched to reject mail at
> the SMTP level for unknown users rather than accept mail and bounce it
> later? qmail in its default operational mode is a spam reflector
Hi,
On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 13:57:39 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry you don't like our feedback, but this is the reason why ITPs are
> posted to debian-devel.
let me say that I think I did change my mind in the course of the
discussion, maybe not entirely in the directio
Hi Sean,
On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 09:09:37 +0100, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and i just have to add that i think it's really silly to add a
> package/program called tcpwatch that doesn't actually... watch tcp
> connections. but whatever, it's not like i'm installing it.
well, that wo
Hi,
On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 00:06:55 +0100, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the FHS (and debian by extension) doesn't provide support for /usr/libexec.
> in every case i know of, contents of what would otherwise have gone
> in /usr/libexec go in /usr/lib/package/ instead.
but this is
Hi,
On Thu, 20.12.2007 at 08:50:39 +1100, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In that case, you could call the package funkload-tcpwatch?
> Perhaps even install the binaries in /usr/lib for use by funkload only?
it is only one "binary", and in fact, I already thought about that, but
I'm
Hi,
On Wed, 19.12.2007 at 18:23:19 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, personally, I'd rather not have such a thing in Debian with that name.
> And the fact that upstream called it that way doesn't speak highly of the
> tool, either IMHO.
well, the latest relea
Hi,
On Mon, 17.12.2007 at 23:10:35 +0100, Guus Sliepen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:42:46PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote:
> > * Package name: tcpwatch
> > Description : tcpwatch is a recorder for HTTP requests in Python
> A few things: wh
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tcpwatch
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Shane Hathaway <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hathawaymix.org/Software/TCPWatch/
* License : ZPL 2.0
P
Hi,
On Wed, 12.09.2007 at 09:20:57 +, John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that. What's real is the time wasted removing whole RFCs from Debian
> in a mindless pursuit of "freedom." Why squander time on trivia when
> there more important things to do.
well, this one can be easily rectif
On Sat, 18.08.2007 at 19:29:55 +0200, Gonsolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know disk space is cheap but having hundreds of megabytes wasted for
> gnome pixmaps I never see or fonts i never use is annoying.
I find the implications of your proposal MUCH more annoying:
* Joe User has to be perm
Hi,
On Fri, 06.07.2007 at 22:43:31 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> As you might be aware, there are several bugs in the Debian boot
> sequence. The bugs affect some combinations of packages, and are some
> times hard to solve. To solve them once and for all, I want us t
Hi,
On Tue, 15.05.2007 at 18:11:03 +1000, Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:51:40PM -0700, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > Some of us have homes, and other property that we would rather not place
> > at risk of any lawsuit connected with our Free Software activities.
Hello,
I agree with most of what Wookey and you said, but would like some
clarification on this:
On Sat, 14.10.2006 at 12:06:20 +0200, Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But sadly, I have very little hope that Debian will change anything it's
> release structure soon. *sigh*
Best
Hi,
I uploaded a version of my roundup package some two days ago which
cleans up important bugs. The package page shows the upload on
2006-10-11, but when searching for it on w.d.o/packages, I get only an
older version which *has* bugs. Any chance that the fixed version gets
into Etch?
http://pa
Hi,
On Mon, 09.10.2006 at 21:47:06 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 22:42 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Aurélien GÉRÔME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > As soon as I send a mail, the deamon restarts... Good news! ;)
> > Yep. Thanks magic elve
Hello,
On Wed, 30.08.2006 at 09:27:21 +0200, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 30, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Debian must decide whether it wants to ship BLOBs with licensing which
> > technically does not permit redistribution. At least 53 blobs have this
>
Hello,
On Sat, 12.08.2006 at 20:40:37 +0200, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a countermeasure, the FSF tries to extend copyright to interfaces,
> so that you do create a derivative work merely by programming to a
> specific interface of a library written by someone else, without
>
Hi,
On Mon, 07.08.2006 at 12:52:26 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.07.1126 +0100]:
> > what are your problems with CDBS?
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/06/msg00451.html
> http://li
Hi,
On Mon, 31.07.2006 at 14:54:50 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With cdbs as negative and alitoh/svn as positive?
what are your problems with CDBS?
Best,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM
Hello,
[ I'm leaning somewhat out of the window here w/o being a law expert ]
On Wed, 12.07.2006 at 12:46:51 -0700, Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg clearly stands that:
>
> 1) Makefiles != scripts or at least it is unclear whether Makefiles may
> be called "scripts":
> ...
> M
Hello Hamish,
On Thu, 13.07.2006 at 09:03:15 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't upstream intend to package it himself? Please contact him to
> check his plans.
ok, I missed, and will check, that, but was deluded into thinking he
wouldn't because he is also not the mainta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I intend to package this module which would be a successor of
python-psycopgda
* Package name: python-psycopgda2
Version : 2.0.2
Upstream Author : Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello,
On Sun, 09.07.2006 at 22:15:40 +0200, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We (iso-codes maintenance team and, more precisely Tobias Toedter)
> discovered that some people reported bugs in the Alioth BTS (or
> tracker?) without us even knowing about it..:-)
I've seen a very si
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
