Re: What is wrong with kde2.1 and unstable ?

Hi, Ivan E. Moore II wrote: > no clue...I don't use apt to upgrade. :) Your not alone tho, there is a > existing bug report on this (#81365)...so any help you can give me to track > down what's going on would be appreciated. On all the boxes I have access > to I use dselect to manage my packag

Re: New package checkmp3 ???

David Starner wrote: > I ran dselect, and lo and behold, checkmp3 appeared. A package > with the same name, similar version number (1.97.3 vs. 1.97.2), > same description and same maintainer as mp3check. This is bad - > should I file a bug on f.d.o, mp3check, checkmp3, or all the > above? AFAIK,

Re: OT Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Michael Beattie wrote: > It was meant as a joke... so go ahead :) That's why I did not really complain about it ;-) > Im not sure why he encrypted to you though. Yeah, I also thought that you should have received this ;-)) (because you asked for it, that is) Ulf

OT Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, Michael Beattie wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 01:19:08AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:54:25AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > > > Um, why send such a message to a widely-read mailing-list? > > > > As a joke... > > Im damned curious..

Re: why can't mc open /dev/gpmctl?

On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Martijn van de Streek wrote: > > Sep 1 12:13:48 pkfp20 mc: /dev/gpmctl: No such file or directory > > > > I wonder why. Maybe a bug in mc? In fact, /dev/gpmctl exists: > > I got these too, with both mc and links. I guess it's a libgpm0-bug. > Installing (and running) gpm fi

why can't mc open /dev/gpmctl?

Hi, found something like this in my logs for every start of mc: Sep 1 12:13:48 pkfp20 mc: /dev/gpmctl: No such file or directory I wonder why. Maybe a bug in mc? In fact, /dev/gpmctl exists: srwxrwxrwx1 root root0 Sep 1 12:16 gpmctl= The '=' is an indication of the fi

Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

Anton Ivanov wrote: > > apache starts up correctly for me on every system boot, and I do have > > /bin/sh pointing to /bin/ash as well. > > My fault. It actually uses #!/bin/bash which it should not anyway Well, #!/bin/bash scripts are allowed to use bashisms :) Ulf

Re: /bin/ksh as a default POSIX shell

Anton Ivanov wrote: > If you are right at least apache scripts are not. I suggest you > file a bug against it. If you know how to call apache scripts to demonstrate the error then please file the bug yourself. Check before, if you run an up-to-date apache. apache starts up correctly

Re: Found the problem: was Re: Help

Dale Scheetz wrote: > /usr/local/bin/pine not found > > If I explicitly call /usr/bin/pine it works just fine. > > I just checked on another user login, and no problems. This must be a bash > command caching artifact. I guess logging out will fix it... hash -r would do it too. Ulf

dwww: cat and file (pipe race condition)

Hi, I'm reading my system documentation with dwww. However, with current potato/woody versions of dwww and file I have trouble for some files (i.e the web server hangs and reports a timeout) Examples for "bad" files are http://localhost/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/usr/doc/menu/html/ch3.

Re: is it time for /usr/share/doc?

Joey Hess wrote: > > I noticed that more and more packages move their doc files to > > /usr/share/doc, > > leaving all kinds of problems with the old one, e.g. empty directories, > > broken links, directories with only one file, ... > > File bug reports for all of these things. Any packages e

is it time for /usr/share/doc?

Hi, I noticed that more and more packages move their doc files to /usr/share/doc, leaving all kinds of problems with the old one, e.g. empty directories, broken links, directories with only one file, ... Did I miss the final say on this? Where was it announced? And should I do this for my pa

procps

Hi, where should 'ps' reside, according to the standard? In the latest version it moved from /bin/ps to /usr/bin/ps. Thanks, Ulf -- #include -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

gnuchess & gnuchess-book

Hi, just recently I installed gnuchess-book and gnuchess. I used something like 'dpkg -i gnuchess-book_* gnuchess_*'. When the packages were configured I got the message: 'note the disappearence of gnuchess-book, which has been completely replaced'. In fact, there's no sign of gnuchess-book

update-alternatives --auto vi

Hello, I installed the latest version of elvis and noticed, that nvi is no longer the default vi (which is set up by update-alternatives --auto vi). Instead, elvisnox is the current default. Is this correct or is it a bug? Where can I read about alternative packages (and especially which on

dpkg-source problem

Hello, when I use dpkg-source on an unchanged source tree it complains about "unrepresentable changes". dpkg-buildpackage exits with an error code. Is this a bug or a feature? How can I circumvent it? Thanks, Ulf -- #include -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word