On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:30:04PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I'm glad to see that Peter has approved of your NMU proposal, as
> migrating away from hand-rolled debian/rules files is a goal that
> I heartily support. However, your original question was one of
> etiquette, and I don't think tha
Hi Craig,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 10:57:30PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> (Please CC me on replies as i'm not subscribed to debian-devel)
> it's been a long time since I've done this, so i'd like to know what
> the current etiquette is for an NMU.
> arpwatch has had only sporadic NMU updates si
* Colin Tuckley (col...@debian.org) [20090901 14:32]:
> Looking in the database, Peter Kelemen doesn't seem to have been
> around for about 2 years. I suspect MIA proceedings need to be
> started if they haven't been already.
I'm still lurking... Adoption has been tried before and died off.
Craig
Quoting Craig Sanders :
(Please CC me on replies as i'm not subscribed to debian-devel)
it's been a long time since I've done this, so i'd like to know what
the current etiquette is for an NMI.
arpwatch has had only sporadic NMU updates since 2004. I've packaged
the latest version and applied
(Please CC me on replies as i'm not subscribed to debian-devel)
it's been a long time since I've done this, so i'd like to know what
the current etiquette is for an NMI.
arpwatch has had only sporadic NMU updates since 2004. I've packaged
the latest version and applied a bunch of patches from th
5 matches
Mail list logo