On 4 May 2005, at 6:39 pm, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
On 1 May 2005, at 8:53 am, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
True. However, it does no harm to add the conflicts, while it does
make
it easier for your users. When presented with a bug in another
pac
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Tim Cutts wrote:
> On 1 May 2005, at 8:53 am, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >True. However, it does no harm to add the conflicts, while it does make
> >it easier for your users. When presented with a bug in another package
> >that completely breaks mine (rather
On 1 May 2005, at 8:53 am, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:38:41AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:45:26PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't
have
users with it installed since it was
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:38:41AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:45:26PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't have
> > users with it installed since it was present there so, IMHO, the
> > Confl
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:04:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > A Replaces without a Conflicts is I think always wrong.
>
> No, absolutely not. See policy, section 7.5, for details -- especially
> section 7.5.1.
Policy i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Just some respoces: (There is several quotings from several people.)
1st the tecnical:
Josselin Mouette:
> As I understand the issue, I have to agree with the maintainer: the
> conflict statement should be added in the wxwidgets 2.5 packages,
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:04:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> A Replaces without a Conflicts is I think always wrong.
>
> No, absolutely not. See policy, section 7.5, for details -- especially
> section 7.5.1.
Still leaves the following pro
"Adam M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>
>>Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The according bug is #306608.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>This is a bug, though possibly not in the libwxgtk2.4-python package. If
>>the relevant maintainers (libwxgtk2.4-python, wxpython2.5.3) and bug
>>s
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:04:35PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> A Replaces without a Conflicts is I think always wrong.
No, absolutely not. See policy, section 7.5, for details -- especially
section 7.5.1.
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 12:38:41AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:45:26PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't have
> > users with it installed since it was present there so, IMHO, the
> > Confl
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:45:26PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> But you remove the package from testing doesn't mean we won't have
> users with it installed since it was present there so, IMHO, the
> Conflict is need.
The bug is in the other package, packages are not required to wor
> "steve" == Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
steve> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:06:31PM -0400, sean finney
steve> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >
>> The according bug is #306608.
>> having read through the bug report, it
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 03:06:31PM -0400, sean finney wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > The according bug is #306608.
> having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing
> to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which re
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>
>> The according bug is #306608.
>
> It looks like the issue there (trying to quickly read through it) is if
> package libwxgtk2.4-python nedds to declare a Conflicts: with package
> wxpython2.5.3. The reason being that both pr
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
>Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>
>
>
>>The according bug is #306608.
>>
>>
>
>This is a bug, though possibly not in the libwxgtk2.4-python package. If
>the relevant maintainers (libwxgtk2.4-python, wxpython2.5.3) and bug
>sumitters can't work out a solution, then ask the Tech
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:36:29PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Wrong. The other package has a broken replaces header, without the required
> conflicts header it needs to have.
yeah, looks like i was. that said, the rest of my response (this should
be forwarded to the tech committ
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, sean finney wrote:
> having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing
> to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which really does
> no harm and does resolve the issue.
Wrong. The other package has a broken replaces header, without the req
(reply to public mail sent to d-devel).
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The problem is that I do not know how to handle with a bug. The
> maintainer of this bug is not in the mood to fix the bug he rather
> slight the submitters (not only me) in the bugreport and also by private
> mail.
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The according bug is #306608.
It looks like the issue there (trying to quickly read through it) is if
package libwxgtk2.4-python nedds to declare a Conflicts: with package
wxpython2.5.3. The reason being that both provide a /usr/bin/helpviewer.
First off, this is a tad bit
Le samedi 30 avril 2005 à 15:06 -0400, sean finney a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > The according bug is #306608.
>
> having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing
> to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:30:38PM +0200, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> The according bug is #306608.
having read through the bug report, it seems to me the appropriate thing
to have done all along was add a Conflicts statement, which really does
no harm and does resolve the issue.
HOWEVER, that said, th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
this is a maybe bit OT mail to this List but I think as improoving the
quality of debian is a bit toppic of the list.
The problem is that I do not know how to handle with a bug. The
maintainer of this bug is not in the mood to fix the bug he r
22 matches
Mail list logo
