> "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>> > "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>> >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actu
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Christian Kurz wrote:
> You don't need a package maintainer to adopt the package for getting a
> new package uploaded. A sponsor for you and Martin would be enough to
> upload the package to the archive.
Okay, sorry, wrong wording. That's what I had in mind. Someone to take
On 00-09-12 Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > > "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
> > >> not eve
On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
> >> not even looked at it in over a year.
>
> Danie
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:42:14PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a
> co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to
> handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.)
Yup, they are
> "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
>> not even looked at it in over a year.
Daniel> If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with
6 matches
Mail list logo
