On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:59:49PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a
> user I miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency
> solver. Using APT in DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create
> some kind of problem, APT
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 07:42:31AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz [2009-02-09 21:12]:
>
> > This means my thoughts were correct, because Aptittude mantainers are
> > trying to implement it. (as I request) This answer I found satisfies
> > me.
>
> They don't implement i
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:52:56PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> OK. Maybe i just supposed APT to do various things I'm used to expect
> from other package managements. Now i undrstand, reading the point of
> view of APT ?cotributor?, this piece of software is not for me.
Could you elabo
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:27:03 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 23:11 +0100, Tilo Schwarz a écrit :
>> > I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
>> > miss a package manager based on powerfulldependency solver.
>>
>> As a user I never had an
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:37:29PM -0800, Daniel Burrows
was heard to say:
> I made early on was not to fetishize arbitrary "optimality" definitions,
> because you can end up chasing phantoms that way. "Optimal" solutions
> are not necessarily best. They are good for academic projects, though,
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 23:11 +0100, Tilo Schwarz a écrit :
> > I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
> > miss a package manager based on powerfulldependency solver.
>
> As a user I never had any problem using aptitude. It lets you cycle
> quickly through i
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 19:39 +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz a
écrit :
> This Debian aproach is great for servers, but not usefull for
> Desktops, where bleeding edge software and mixed repositories could be
> expected.
Bullshit. On desktops as well as on servers, bleeding edge software will
o
Le lundi 09 février 2009 à 20:56 +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz a
écrit :
> This paper claims, that experimental branch of Aptitude include a
> prototype of mentioned powerfull solver (same as zypper or smart).
> (page 15):
>
> http://people.debian.org/~dburrows/model.pdf
If you are talking about
* kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz [2009-02-09 21:12]:
> This means my thoughts were correct, because Aptittude mantainers are
> trying to implement it. (as I request) This answer I found satisfies
> me.
They don't implement it on your request.
yours
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:59:49PM +0100, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz was heard to
say:
> I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I miss
> a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in
> DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create some kind of p
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:31 +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> > I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
> > miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in
> > DEB-based distributions, I can easilly creat
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:59:49 +0100, wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfulldependency solver.
As a user I never had any problem using aptitude. It lets you cycle
quickly through its different dependency resolu
Darren Salt wrote:
> I demand that Eugene V. Lyubimkin may or may not have written...
>
>> kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
>> <...>
> [note: reformatted]
>> I don't feel comfortable to answer on your mails. Use '>' for quoting,
>> don't include mail headers into answers, and wrap the text, really.
I demand that Eugene V. Lyubimkin may or may not have written...
> kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> <...>
[note: reformatted]
> I don't feel comfortable to answer on your mails. Use '>' for quoting,
> don't include mail headers into answers, and wrap the text, really. Why I
> have to spend my time
I don't know, If you know the correct answer, but I was right. I found some
paper with additional explanation of the dependency solver problem in Debian.
This paper claims, that experimental branch of Aptitude include a prototype of
mentioned powerfull solver (same as zypper or smart). (page 15)
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
>
> __
>> Od: jackyf.de...@gmail.com Komu: kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz CC:
>> debian-devel@lists.debian.org, de...@lists.debian.org Datum:
>> 09.02.2009 18:15 Předmět: Re: incapable and
Sorry.
I'm not familiar with mailing list, and it take me a lot of time event to find
out, how to response. Apologise myself. I did not know. I'm not used to.
have a nice day.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
<...>
I don't feel comfortable to answer on your mails. Use '>' for quoting, don't
include mail
headers into answers, and wrap the text, really. Why I have to spend my time to
parse your
mails while you don't have a time even to configure your mail client?
Or wait
__
> Od: jackyf.de...@gmail.com
> Komu: kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz
> CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, de...@lists.debian.org
> Datum: 09.02.2009 18:15
> Předmět: Re: incapable and obsolete APT / Aptitude replacemen
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> #> If you look at the comparison i posted above, you can se that APT is
> worse than Urpmi and SMART - which was the best dependency solver in that
> comparison. Zypper mentioned above, is a ittle bit better than #smart:
> #>
> #If you look at users' feelin
__
> Od: jackyf.de...@gmail.com
> Komu: kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz
> CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, APT Development Team
> Datum: 09.02.2009 14:20
> Předmět: Re: incapable and obsolete APT / Aptit
Hello, please wrap your mails properly in future.
APT development list CC'ed.
kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
> I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I miss
> a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in
> DEB-based distributions, I can eas
On 02/09/2009 05:59 AM, kc.ubuntu...@centrum.cz wrote:
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I
miss a package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT
in DEB-based distributions, I can easilly create some kind of problem,
APT is unable to solve. Th
I would like to ask you a little bit controversal question. As a user I miss a
package manager based on powerfull dependency solver. Using APT in DEB-based
distributions, I can easilly create some kind of problem, APT is unable to
solve. This is because the APT is the worst dependency solver alm
24 matches
Mail list logo
