[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing.
This is an exceedingly nasty library. There is way too much templatization in
this library, and GCC spews warnings like there's no tomorrow.
I'd be interested in working on tracking down the linking problems, but
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:33:28AM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums
> [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this.
[1] clearly stats this as illegal according to the C++ standard.
> What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuse
On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 01:33 +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I am loosing.
>
> GCC4 does definitely not like a mix of templates and anonymous enums
> [1,2] but there are easy fixes for this.
>
> What is worse, it seems that GCC4 silently refuses to gen
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Below is a list of libraries which appear to be blocking other packages that
> need to go through the C++ transition[1] and which are themselves ready to
> go through the ABI transition.
[...]
> libcrypto++
I am fighting with libcrypto++ but so far I a
4 matches
Mail list logo