On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 17:41 +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
> >
> > Bu
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 12:18 +0300, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
> >
> > But
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
>
> But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
> OpenSolaris-b
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 12:13:57AM -0700, Erast Benson wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
> > time, doesn't it provide sunwlxsl on other arches?
>
> But how? sunwlxsl is something which is only present in
> OpenSolaris-b
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 00:04 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
> > +Provides: sunwlxsl [solaris-i386]
> > Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
>
> Why not simply use Provide: ${misc:Provides} and set misc:Provides to
> sunwlxsl on solaris-i386?
OK. Th
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006, Erast Benson wrote:
> +Provides: sunwlxsl [solaris-i386]
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Why not simply use Provide: ${misc:Provides} and set misc:Provides to
sunwlxsl on solaris-i386? Why not simply Provide: sunwlxsl all of the
time, doesn't it provide sunwlxs
ippet from libxslt package where I'm trying to use
Provides field but for "solaris-i386" architecture only.
Could you guys confirm that per-architecture Provides field is a
supported format? If not, what would be the right way?
=
7 matches
Mail list logo
