Hi Rodrigo,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:21:12AM -0800, Rodrigo Gallardo wrote:
> I do!
ah, nice to hear from you.
> I have been extremely remiss in my duties, and I have let ego keep
> me from accepting it.
>
> I have orphaned stunnel and all of my other packages. Feel free to
>
On Friday, February 07, 2014 17:09:27 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo
> Gallardo Cruz"): ...
>
> > Well, here's the typical scenario:
> >- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever rea
Chris Knadle writes ("Re: Packaging of stunnel / MIA for Luis Rodrigo Gallardo
Cruz"):
...
> Well, here's the typical scenario:
>
>- maintainer stops maintaining a package, for whatever reason,
> and doesn't respond to communication... for a long ti
cgi?bug=728545
>
> I didn't change the packaging style in doing this, but just about everything
> else did. ;-) Obviously I was willing to support the package if there were
> problems brought by my sponsored upload, and as long as you keep this in mind
> as well then I
esn't make sense if the next Stable release is going
to be frozen within that timeframe and the package may get dropped for being
ancient, if the package has fallen out of Testing because of dependency
issues, if there are security or other RC bugs... and so on. Whether or not
you can wait
Adding Gregor Herrmann to this because he and I were looking to work on
#672198 but we both were swamped with other work.
On Friday, February 07, 2014 00:02:16 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Seba
On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 03:27:51PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> [...]
>
> NMUs don't necessarily need to be minimalistic -- for instance packaging new
> versions is something that can be done with NMUs. This is admittedly not
> t
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 13:59:59 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There have been multiple new upstream releases for stunnel4 and the
> package has gathered quite some bugs without any feedback from its
> maintainer. Looking at Rodrigo's QA page [0] his last actions were
> quite some time
Hi,
There have been multiple new upstream releases for stunnel4 and the
package has gathered quite some bugs without any feedback from its
maintainer. Looking at Rodrigo's QA page [0] his last actions were
quite some time ago (2012) and most packages would have gathered RC
bugs without the help of
; > one.
> >
> > I can offer something as well - I would probably lean towards just
> > auth+ssl instead of over VPN, but it's up to you. I just don't happen
> > to have a VPN set up yet, so it's less ovrhead for me :)
>
> Could we think on some stu
d of over VPN, but it's up to you. I just don't happen
> to have a VPN set up yet, so it's less ovrhead for me :)
Could we think on some stunnel or OpenVPN feature under
people.debian.org/other machine to get mail from debian.org routed to the
outside world?
With stunnel, a
Hello,
I created a new package for stunnel 4, it is available at :
http://people.debian.org/~speedblue/stunnel/
I will wait a little before take over the package.
Best Regards.
--
Julien LEMOINE / SpeedBlue
pgpNIXSuf9fJZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I saw stunnel has not been uploaded since december 2001, so unstable
version
of stunnel is very old.
I use stunnel on all my computers, and I would like to take over the
package.
Is there any objection ? ( I sent a mail to current maintainer Paolo
Molaro
13 matches
Mail list logo
