Re: Lenny with KDE 3.5.10 on 256MB memory

2009-05-21 Thread PaulNM
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:53 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but comfortably > above the minimum. > > Has anyone any experience of how well or badly this actually runs? > > TIA > Lisi > I run a Lenny machine with 256MB in an office env

Re: Lenny with KDE 3.5.10 on 256MB memory

2009-05-19 Thread Martin Bretschneider
Am Dienstag 19 Mai 2009 schrieb Lisi Reisz: > This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but > comfortably above the minimum. KDE 3.4 from Etch ran flawless with kmail and iceweasel with 256 MB RAM. HTH Martin -- http://www.bretschneidernet.de/OpenPGP-key: 0x4EA52583

Re: Lenny with KDE 3.5.10 on 256MB memory

2009-05-19 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mar 19 May 2009 05:53:48 Lisi Reisz escribió: > This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but > comfortably above the minimum. No, I had a 512 MB system for years and worked flawlessly. indeed, when I switched to 1 GB, I couldn't notice it during normal use (not compiling,

Re: Lenny with KDE 3.5.10 on 256MB memory

2009-05-19 Thread Mike Bird
On Tue May 19 2009 01:53:48 Lisi Reisz wrote: > This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but > comfortably above the minimum. > > Has anyone any experience of how well or badly this actually runs? My backup laptop is an old Thinkpad with a P2/366 and 256MB RAM. It runs the sa

Lenny with KDE 3.5.10 on 256MB memory

2009-05-19 Thread Lisi Reisz
This is, I know, below the recommended amount of RAM (512MB), but comfortably above the minimum. Has anyone any experience of how well or badly this actually runs? TIA Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma