On Wednesday 08 November 2006 19:10, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I tried to rebuilt rootskel yesterday and I got:
> >
> > Making install in src-bootfloppy
> > make[2]: entrant dans le répertoire «
> > /home/jerome/d-i/packages/rootskel/src-bootfloppy » Making build in
> > bin
> > ma
tags 391626 +patch
Hi
As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include
my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log
since about a month.
AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for
linux-image-2.6.18-2-*.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 391626 +patch
Bug#391626: add mol to linux-modules-extra-2.6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> Hi
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include
Unknown comma
FYI: The status of the initramfs-tools source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.84
Current version: 0.85a
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
* Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-08 21:07]:
> Sure, wookey had some extra comments after i asked for permission to post it
> so
> i've added those too:
> http://beast.luon.net/~sjoerd/arm_unaligned.log
http://netwinder.osuosl.org/users/b/brianbr/public_html/alignment.html
Ok, thank
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 06:46:38PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-08 14:02]:
> > Some discussion on #debian-arm indicates that it the current default
>
> Can you make logs of that discussion available?
Sure, wookey had some extra comments after i a
* Sjoerd Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-08 14:02]:
> Some discussion on #debian-arm indicates that it the current default
Can you make logs of that discussion available?
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:50:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397139: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:50:29 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#397281: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:50:26 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391275: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
UPDATE: BTTV SOUND is now WORKING AGAIN with this KERNEL 2.6.18-1-686 #1 SMP Sat Oct 21 17:21:28 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux I've periodically tried newer kernels and this one (above) is the FIRST ONE (since 2.6.17) that has sound working OK again on my PCI BTTV T
Accepted:
linux-2.6_2.6.18-5.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-5.diff.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.18-5.dsc
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-2.6_2.6.18-5.dsc
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-5_all.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-5_all.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all-powerpc_2.6.
linux-2.6_2.6.18-5_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-2.6_2.6.18-5.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.18-5.diff.gz
linux-doc-2.6.18_2.6.18-5_all.deb
linux-manual-2.6.18_2.6.18-5_all.deb
linux-patch-debian-2.6.18_2.6.18-5_all.deb
linux-source-2.6.18_2.6.18-5_al
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Falk Hueffner wrote:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Given that you mention you're not running a Debian kernel at all
right now, and that this code is in place upstream and nobody else
seems to have complained loudly enough to get it fixed, I'm not sure
how much e
* maximilian attems wrote:
> nobse please check if the patch from vorlon satitisfies.
Looks good, first flavour built fine, second one still building.
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Accepted:
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all-m68k_2.6.18-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all-m68k_2.6.18-4_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all_2.6.18-4_m68k.deb
to pool/main/l/linux-2.6/linux-headers-2.6.18-2-all_2.6.18-4_m68k.deb
linux-headers-2.6.18-2-amiga_2.6.18-4_m68k.d
Your message dated Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:09:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ethernet stops working (rtl8139)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Wed, 8 Nov 2006 15:09:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ethernet stops working (rtl8139)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 22:46 +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:11:52PM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 21:32 +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:18:36PM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
> > > > Hi ,
> > > >
> > > > The situat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 397616 [arm] /proc/cpu/alignment should default to warn and fixup on
> arm
Bug#397616: /proc/cpu/alignment should default to warn and fixup on arm
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: linux-2.6
Severity: normal
Hi,
By default the ARM kernel just ignores unaligned accesses from
userspace and can just accesses another address then actually
specified. This can cause strange behaviour by userspace programs.
While i agree that these programs are somewhat buggy, b
Hello,
I can reproduce this with the latest from kernel.org too. Here are the
logs:
http://kapsi.fi/mcfrisk/temp/bt_oops.txt
-Mikko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW, having Xen + vserver in the one kernel is a sweet sweet thing for
me. Kudos and thanks to the whizzes in the kernel team.
Tony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Lewis wrote:
My initial question: is anybody using the Xen stuff in this kernel?
Just so as I know I'm not wasting time on something not yet working...
... never mind - should have waited and tried some more things. Got it
working now.
Tony
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:11:52PM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
>> ps. i'm on the list
>
> I guess you should tell your MUA and not us, I didn't see any note of that
> in the headers of your mail.
Debian Mailinglist Code o
On 04.11.06 09:51, Alien wrote:
> I did not seem to find this topic in this list - I hope it is the right
> place to discuss that.
>
> The problem is - mounting UFS under Linux and to provide
> both - R and W options.
&npsb? Where did you edit this mail?
> So far I have found that R is easily
I'm trying the linux-image-2.6.18-1-xen-vserver (2.6.18-3) kernel, and
I'm having trouble creating (booting) a domU. The symptom appears to be
that it boots, then hangs for about 100 seconds, then crashes. I assume
the 100s is a Xen timeout thing.
My initial question: is anybody using the Xe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:18:36PM +0100, Eugen Paiuc wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> The situation described in
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2006/11/msg00032.html
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2006/11/msg00034.html
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 397550 linux-2.6
Bug#397550: routing between alias subnets on same interface produces RFC-1812
contravening ICMP redirects
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processi
Package: linux-image
Version: 2.6.18
This really isnt debian's fault. I just want to see if I can get a bug
that was talked about and a patch offered for linux 2.2 in 2000 (!!)
and discussed several times since actually FIXED sometime somehow.
At least debian can patch it in its kernels even if th
30 matches
Mail list logo