Bug#565789: [ltp] Re: Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On jeu., 2010-01-21 at 13:29 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > "SM" == Shannon McMackin writes: > > SM> I think it's wonderful that the current version at least knows > what > SM> the current BIOS rev is, that in itself is a huge amount of work > to > SM> add in considering the variety of

Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e: TSO is broken

2010-01-20 Thread Jie Yang
Anders Boström > Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 5:27 PM > To: Jie Yang > Cc: b...@decadent.org.uk; net...@vger.kernel.org; > 565...@bugs.debian.org; Xiong Huang > Subject: Re: Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e: > TSO is broken > > > "JY" == Jie Yang writes: > > JY> Anders Bos

Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread jidanni
> "SM" == Shannon McMackin writes: SM> I think it's wonderful that the current version at least knows what SM> the current BIOS rev is, that in itself is a huge amount of work to SM> add in considering the variety of ThinkPad models. Exactly. Here's my several versions of a reply: 1. So pl

Bug#565789: [ltp] Re: Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread jidanni
OK, I found the file. One needs to scrape it out of a browser, as there is no way to wget it. All I know is you do printk(TPACPI_INFO "%s v%s\n", TPACPI_DESC, TPACPI_VERSION); printk(TPACPI_INFO "%s\n", TPACPI_URL); and then later if ((bios_version > thinkpad_id.bios_releas

Bug#565789: [ltp] Re: Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > "H" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: > The warning to upgrade comes with the users current version number. The driver always logs the current version number at INFO priority at startup, because otherwise I don't know what firmware is i

Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread jidanni
> "H" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: H> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: >> Indeed, why tease the user with any version numbers in the first place, H> I don't. The warning to upgrade comes with the users current version number. >> if there is no way provided for him to

Bug#565789: [ltp] Re: Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Candidate out of your binary. So I needn't download the whole kernel > source tar just to extract that one number each time I want to know what Go to http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=tree and navigate to drivers/p

Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Indeed, why tease the user with any version numbers in the first place, I don't. > if there is no way provided for him to pry the other half out of your > binary. If you care so much, go read the source code, which incidently is the ONLY thing I

Processed: bug 566079 is forwarded to da...@davemloft.net

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 566079 da...@davemloft.net Bug #566079 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-sparc64: SBUS sunbmac module doesn't work Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'da...@davemloft.net'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you ne

Bug#566079: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-sparc64: SBUS sunbmac module doesn't work

2010-01-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2010-01-21 at 01:26 +0100, David Garabana Barro wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.32-5 > Severity: important > > > Since I upgraded my Ultra 1 Sparc from lenny to testing/squeeze, I cannot > make Sbus Big Mac to run. > With lenny's 2.6.26, it worked OK, but with both testing's 2

Bug#566079: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-sparc64: SBUS sunbmac module doesn't work

2010-01-20 Thread David Garabana Barro
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-5 Severity: important Since I upgraded my Ultra 1 Sparc from lenny to testing/squeeze, I cannot make Sbus Big Mac to run. With lenny's 2.6.26, it worked OK, but with both testing's 2.6.30 and sid's 2.6.32, I get the following message: [ 723.175812] sunbmac.c

Bug#566057: hostap: hostap_main.c prism2.5 error. Squeeze.

2010-01-20 Thread dann frazier
Please try 2.6.32. 2.6.32 is in sid and can be installed on squeeze systems. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#423082: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Problem with Belkin USB 2.0 Notebook Card in Toshiba 4000CDS.)

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:15:38 + with message-id <1264025738.2169.17.ca...@localhost> and subject line Re: Re(2): Bug#423082: Problem with Belkin USB 2.0 Notebook Card ... has caused the Debian Bug report #423082, regarding linux-image-2.6.18-4-686: Problem with Belkin USB 2.0 No

Bug#566057: marked as done (hostap: hostap_main.c prism2.5 error. Squeeze.)

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:00:44 -0700 with message-id <20100120220044.gb26...@lackof.org> and subject line Re: Bug#566057: hostap: hostap_main.c prism2.5 error. Squeeze. has caused the Debian Bug report #566057, regarding hostap: hostap_main.c prism2.5 error. Squeeze. to be marked as

Bug#566057: hostap: hostap_main.c prism2.5 error. Squeeze.

2010-01-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 13:20 -0800, David Robinson wrote: > Subject: hostap: hostap prism2.5 error. > Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64 > Version: 2.6.30-8squeeze1 [...] Squeeze will be released with Linux 2.6.32, which is currently in sid. Please could you test whether this is fixed in that vers

Bug#566057: hostap: hostap_main.c prism2.5 error. Squeeze.

2010-01-20 Thread David Robinson
Subject: hostap: hostap prism2.5 error. Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-amd64 Version: 2.6.30-8squeeze1 File: hostap Severity: normal *** Please type your report below this line *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/linux/+bug/444801 [14149.269718] Virtual device wifi0 asks to queu

Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread jidanni
What if instead of # apt-cache policy somepackage Installed: 2.10.2-2 Candidate: 2.11~0exp1-0exp1 it just said # apt-cache policy somepackage Installed: 2.10.2-2 Candidate: UPGRADE NOW Indeed, why tease the user with any version numbers in the first place, if there is no way provided for hi

Bug#566056: problem with hook script with - in the name

2010-01-20 Thread Joey Hess
Package: initramfs-tools Version: 0.93.4 Severity: normal I was suprised that my hook script /etc/initramfs-tools/hooks/kvm-hosting-rsync was not run until I renamed it to not have dashes in the name. (The hook script consisted of a single call to rsync, FWIW.) -- Package-specific info: -- /proc

console resolution

2010-01-20 Thread Nima Azarbayjany
Okay. But the problem really does not seem to be Grub. It's I think the kernel which is refusing the vga=xxx option. It seems to have been replaced by something else. A message is printed but it disapears so fast that I can't see it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists

Re: console resolution

2010-01-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:14:07PM +0330, Nima Azarbayjany wrote: > Hi all, > > I used to use vga=xxx on the kernel parameters line in etch and in lenny > to set the console resolution. I used to add it to > > #defopts= ... > > line in Grub's menu.lst and then update-grub. Now I have installed

Bug#565789: [ltp] Re: Bug#565789: say what the current Thinkpad BIOS/Firmware should be

2010-01-20 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > > "H" == Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes: > > H> The version the driver thinks you should use is the latest that was > H> available when I wasted a few hours tracking them all. > > Yes, but in addition to giving the message > "Your version

console resolution

2010-01-20 Thread Nima Azarbayjany
Hi all, I used to use vga=xxx on the kernel parameters line in etch and in lenny to set the console resolution. I used to add it to #defopts= ... line in Grub's menu.lst and then update-grub. Now I have installed squeeze and can't figure out how to do it. What is the equivalent of vga=xx

Bug#423082: Re(2): Bug#423082: Problem with Belkin USB 2.0 Notebook Card ...

2010-01-20 Thread peasthope
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:18:36 +, Ben Hutchings wrote, > I suspect that the Cardbus USB adapter or the power supply to the > Cardbus slot may be faulty. Do other Cardbus cards work properly in this > slot? Can you test the adapter in a Windows system (after > installing any Windows driver t

Bug#566019: linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-amd64: Debian does not wake up after standby

2010-01-20 Thread Carl-M. Hoefer
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-5 Severity: important I i try to wake the computer up from standy, i just get a black screen. No keyboard inputs have any affect. Ping from other computers get an timeout. I looked at /var/log/messages var/log/syslog and /var/log/pm-suspend.log and could not fi

Bug#552465: marked as done (r8169 does not work correctly for RTL8111)

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#552465: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.26-1um-2+21 has caused the Debian Bug report #552465, regarding r8169 does not work correctly for RTL8111 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#513050: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel Oops when reconnecting external usb soundcard)

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#513050: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.26-1um-2+21 has caused the Debian Bug report #513050, regarding linux-image-2.6.26-1-686: Kernel Oops when reconnecting external usb soundcard to be marked as done. This m

Bug#444043: marked as done (network-manager: Unconnected USB ethernet device is made to take priority over connected wireless!)

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#444043: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.26-1um-2+21 has caused the Debian Bug report #444043, regarding network-manager: Unconnected USB ethernet device is made to take priority over connected wireless! to be mar

Bug#550898: marked as done (DASD DIAG driver doesn't work for read-only minidisks (s390, s390x only))

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#550898: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.26-1um-2+21 has caused the Debian Bug report #550898, regarding DASD DIAG driver doesn't work for read-only minidisks (s390, s390x only) to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#558426: marked as done (atl1e performance problems with native IPv6)

2010-01-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#558426: fixed in user-mode-linux 2.6.26-1um-2+21 has caused the Debian Bug report #558426, regarding atl1e performance problems with native IPv6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#565977: [linux-2.6] touchpad not woks severail minutes after X startup

2010-01-20 Thread Liang Guo
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.32-5 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, I'm using a HP 6515b laptop with 2.6.32-trunk-amd64, After I login to kde, the touchpad may not work in several minutes, when it not work, I can see followng message in dmesg output:

Bug#565404: linux-image-2.6.26-2-amd64: atl1e: TSO is broken

2010-01-20 Thread Anders Boström
> "JY" == Jie Yang writes: JY> Anders Boström wrote: >> It is an ASUS M4A78 PRO motherboard with the Atheros >> AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 on-board. >> >> >> ~25Mbyte/s performance. I get ~5000 retransmitted packets >> per GByte >> data, according to RetransSegs in >> /proc/net/snmp . wir