The MIBs are not technically necessary for the SNMP protocol itself to
work. In fact, most of the SNMP agent's functionality is just fine
without installed MIBs. The command line clients, however, are far less
useful (still usable, but much more of a pain for the operator).
If you want to get r
2008/9/15 Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Davi Leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is it so hard for you understand, that not being able to distribute only
>> the
>> binary of a modified Linux kernel (without distributing its source code)
>> is a
>> rectriction?
On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Davi Leal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it so hard for you understand, that not being able to distribute only
> the
> binary of a modified Linux kernel (without distributing its source code) is
> a
> rectriction?
I think at this point we're all clear on the t
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> Is it so hard for your to understand, that not being able to run
> modified services secretly is a restriction?
Is it so hard for you understand, that not being able to distribute only the
binary of a modified Linux kernel (without distributing its source code) is a
rec
* Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080915 18:25]:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:36:54 -0500 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> >> I have been interpreting the AGPL, and so far have not been challenged
> >> on this interpretation, that these additional costs can be transferred
> >> onto third
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Vincent,
> I have just opened two bugs against libsmi-common and libsnmp-base:
> http://bugs.debian.org/498476
> http://bugs.debian.org/498475
>
> Those packages ship MIB files that are non-free (same license as IETF
> RFC). However, there i
2008/9/13 Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:36:54 -0500 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
>> I have been interpreting the AGPL, and so far have not been challenged
>> on this interpretation, that these additional costs can be transferred
>> onto third parties for whom the c
Måns Rullgård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first "it" is clearly referring to the unmodified source. The
> second "it" has no other noun to refer to [...]
No noun except the altered source, the outcome of the first action?
Compare: if I say "This box: I'll wrap it and post it to you" then I
Guten Tag
Wir möchten Sie gerne auf folgende Spezialaktion im Rahmen des 8.
Schweizerischen eHealthcare Kongresses aufmerksam machen:
Zu jedem Handbuch kostenlos Ihr Werkzeug zum Umbruch! 1 Victorinox Sackmesser
mit USB Stick (4GB).
Das interdisziplinäre Handbuch mit der prozess- und praxis
9 matches
Mail list logo