Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-30 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > I think everyone does claim that. You do know Debian doesn't just Everyone being whom specifically? > distribute the binaries from Php.net, right? No contortion: the php5 > in Debian is a derived work. Here's a list of patches > http://sources.debian.net/src/php5/5.6.0%7Erc2%2Bdfsg-5/debia

Re: [PECL-DEV] Re: Re: [PHP-QA] Debian and the PHP license

2014-07-30 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > This reading clearly fails DFSG#3 and OSD#3 at the very least, and makes > *all* software using the PHP Licence non-free, because redistribution of > derived works is only permitted from *.php.net which is clearly inaccep- > table. This makes not just forking the software impossible but also

Re: [PECL-DEV] Debian request to change the PHP license for Extensions

2014-06-27 Thread Stas Malyshev
Hi! > I think the difference is that we have a couple of clauses which sounds > weird/makes no sense when the license is used for extensions or anything > else than php-src, like clause 3, 4 and 6. > And this is what they were complaining about in the thread referenced > from their reject faq: > h