Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-03 21:02:29 +0100 (Sun, 03 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1154
Modified:
trunk/testset/foo++/debian/control
trunk/testset/tags.foo++
Log:
dpkg-gencontrol now compresses commas with nothing between them, so
remove the lintian test assuming those are copied into the package.
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-03 21:06:03 +0100 (Sun, 03 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1155
Modified:
trunk/testset/foo++/debian/control
Log:
Restore the broken UTF-8.
Modified: trunk/testset/foo++/debian/control
===
--- trunk/testset/foo+
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-03 21:07:42 +0100 (Sun, 03 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1156
Added:
trunk/testset/scripts/guile-bizarre
Modified:
trunk/checks/scripts
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/scripts/debian/rules
trunk/testset/tags.scripts
Log:
+ [RA] Catch exec wrappers that use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1156 by rra
> tag 463476 + pending
Bug#463476: [checks/scripts] script_is_evil_and_wrong() could catch more scripts
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-03 21:33:59 +0100 (Sun, 03 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1157
Added:
trunk/testset/binary/debian/templates
Modified:
trunk/checks/po-debconf
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/po-debconf:
+ [RA] Exclude from not-using-po-debconf template files with only the
sha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1157 by rra
> tag 460731 + pending
Bug#460731: not-using-po-debconf is overeager
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-03 22:22:35 +0100 (Sun, 03 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1158
Modified:
trunk/checks/fields
trunk/checks/fields.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/tags.cdbs-test
trunk/testset/tags.debconf
Log:
* checks/fields{.desc,}:
+ [RA] Versioned Python dependencie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1158 by rra
> tag 460625 + pending
Bug#460625: Check for python build-deps doesn't allow packages relying on
specific versions
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
S
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-03 22:28:53 +0100 (Sun, 03 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1159
Modified:
trunk/checks/infofiles
trunk/checks/menus
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/scripts/debian/rules
Log:
+ [RA] Fix Perl warnings given a zero-byte maintainer script. Thanks,
Thijs Kinkho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1159 by rra
> tag 460966 + pending
Bug#460966: uninitialized values when having empty prerm script
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1160 by rra
> tag 273309 + pending
Bug#273309: .devhelp usability check
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 00:06:18 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1160
Modified:
trunk/checks/files
trunk/checks/files.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/filenames/debian/rules
trunk/testset/tags.filenames
Log:
* checks/files{.desc,}:
+ [RA] Fix a long-standing e
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 01:22:38 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1161
Modified:
trunk/checks/files
trunk/checks/files.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/etcfiles/debian/conffiles
trunk/testset/etcfiles/debian/rules
trunk/testset/tags.etcfiles
Log:
+ [RA] Warn
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2008 16:11:59 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Add warning for build-depends on lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1161 by rra
> tag 458742 + pending
Bug#458742: lintian: Please test for valid filenames for run-parts
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 03:55:53 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1164
Modified:
trunk/checks/files
trunk/checks/files.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/filenames/debian/rules
trunk/testset/tags.filenames
Log:
+ [RA] Warn of .gitignore files installed by the pac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1163 by rra
> tag 458785 + pending
Bug#458785: [checks/fields] *-dbg packages should not have empty dependencies
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing her
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1164 by rra
> tag 459502 + pending
Bug#459502: Detect when package installs a ".gitignore" file
Tags were: patch
Bug#460844: lintian: warn about the presence of .gitignore files in bi
Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.42
> Severity: normal
>
> One of my packages produces this lintian warning:
>
> W: heroes source: desktop-file-but-no-dh_desktop-call
> N:
> N: It looks like your package includes a .desktop file and you use
> N: d
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 03:37:03 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1162
Modified:
trunk/checks/files.desc
Log:
Fix <> in tag description.
Modified: trunk/checks/files.desc
===
--- trunk/checks/files.desc 2008-02-04
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 03:38:13 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1163
Modified:
trunk/checks/fields
trunk/checks/fields.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/tags.debug
Log:
+ [RA] Check that -dbg packages depend on their base package. Patch
from Chris Lamb. (Cl
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Severity: normal
One of my packages produces this lintian warning:
W: heroes source: desktop-file-but-no-dh_desktop-call
N:
N: It looks like your package includes a .desktop file and you use
N: debhelper to build it, but you don't call dh_desktop in your ru
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 04:58:44 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1165
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
* checks/binaries:
+ [RA] Don't require objdump's errors on files with bad dynamic tables
to start at the beginning of the line. Patch from Chr
Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.43
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please consider a note about the "unconditional rmdir issue" in the
> package-contains-empty-perl-directory description. Something like this:
>
> This package installs an empty /usr/lib/perl5 or /
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 05:24:27 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1168
Modified:
trunk/checks/files
trunk/checks/files.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/manpages/debian/overrides
trunk/testset/tags.filenames
trunk/testset/tags.manpages
Log:
+ [RA] Remove the
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 05:10:37 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1167
Modified:
trunk/checks/files
trunk/debian/changelog
Log:
+ [RA] Warn of more language extensions on files in the user's path.
Patch from Chris Lamb. (Closes: #459514)
Modified: trunk/checks/files
==
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1165 by rra
> tag 459509 + pending
Bug#459509: Regression in 'binary-with-bad-dynamic-table' test
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please cont
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 05:05:55 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1166
Modified:
trunk/testset/binary/debian/rules
Log:
Use a hard link to reduce the arch-dependent part of binary so that
the huge usr/share check will still trigger. Thanks, Chris Lamb.
Modified: trunk/testset/bina
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1167 by rra
> tag 459514 + pending
Bug#459514: 'script-with-language-extension' should check for more languages
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Your message dated Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:06:49 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Regression in 'arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share' testcase
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1168 by rra
> tag 463138 + pending
Bug#463138: lintian: package-contains-empty-perl-directory and Perl 5.10
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing h
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.42
Severity: normal
Hi,
As best I can determine, Lintian was complaining about a changelog line
being too long, when it was 77 characters long, but it contained three
unicode characters in it. I'm guessing it was counting the unicode
characters as two characters eac
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.42
> Severity: normal
>
> As best I can determine, Lintian was complaining about a changelog line
> being too long, when it was 77 characters long, but it contained three
> unicode characters in it. I'm guessing it was c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> merge 461822 463913
Bug#461822: lintian: Please consider correct (Unicode-aware) line length in
debian/changelog for line-too-long
Bug#463913: lintian: Miscounts line length when un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> merge 463913 461822
Bug#461822: lintian: Please consider correct (Unicode-aware) line length in
debian/changelog for line-too-long
Bug#463913: lintian: Miscounts line length when uni
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package lintian
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: lintian
> # Fixed in r1169 by rra
> tag 461350 + pending
Bug#461350: [shared-libs] Check for a missing libc dependency indicating
${shlibs:Depends} problems
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Author: rra
Date: 2008-02-04 08:24:56 +0100 (Mon, 04 Feb 2008)
New Revision: 1169
Modified:
trunk/checks/binaries
trunk/checks/binaries.desc
trunk/debian/changelog
trunk/testset/tags.diffs
Log:
* checks/binaries{.desc,}:
+ [RA] Warn for packages that have binaries requiring libc but
37 matches
Mail list logo
