Re: Drop support for libqb?

2019-11-14 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:24:55AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > We usually mark affected CVE as in data/CVE/list and just > > add the package to security-support-ended.deb8 in > > debian-security-support. We then upload new versions of the package > > periodically and announce it via DLA.

Re: (E)LTS report for October

2019-11-14 Thread Holger Levsen
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 11:03:17AM +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > I believe it's a matter of magnitude: the doc's example is about a 10% > excess, while this was about a ~200% excess. this, exactly. > Coordination allows to average the workload and reactivity, for instance > by adding more peopl

Re: Drop support for libqb?

2019-11-14 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:19:03PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:24:55AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > We usually mark affected CVE as in data/CVE/list and just > > > add the package to security-support-ended.deb8 in > > > debian-security-support. We then upload

Re: Drop support for libqb?

2019-11-14 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 01:31:27PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 05:19:03PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 08:24:55AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > We usually mark affected CVE as in data/CVE/list and just > > > > add the package to

automatically strip no-dsa tags by gen-DLA

2019-11-14 Thread Brian May
In an attempt to complete this TODO item from the wiki: automatically strip no-dsa tags by gen-DLA https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/TODO#automatically_strip_no-dsa_tags_by_gen-DLA This is my very early attempt to modify the CVE parser so that it can write the results back to the CVE file again. Meanin