Bug#685836: RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 reintroduction

2012-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:33:06AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > On 25/08/12 08:14, Bart Martens wrote: > >On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:00:02AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >>On 25/08/12 07:06, Bart Martens wrote: > >>>Is your goal to add this package to wheezy ? The package at mentors > >>>uploade

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-24 Thread Vasudev Kamath
On 20:32 Fri 24 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote: > You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball > in the wrong directory. Ok I messed up. It was fine till I didn't introduced the mktemp to create secure tmp directory. But when I did I forgot to check where on earth the .orig.tar.g

Bug#685836: RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 reintroduction

2012-08-24 Thread Jerome BENOIT
On 25/08/12 08:14, Bart Martens wrote: On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:00:02AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: On 25/08/12 07:06, Bart Martens wrote: Is your goal to add this package to wheezy ? The package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-25 01:46 appears to have more minimal differences with 1.9

Bug#685836: RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 reintroduction

2012-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 08:00:02AM +0200, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > On 25/08/12 07:06, Bart Martens wrote: > >Is your goal to add this package to wheezy ? The package at mentors uploaded > >there on 2012-08-25 01:46 appears to have more minimal differences with > >1.92-14. > > My primary goal is get

Re: dh machinery and module how to export only given symbol

2012-08-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Hello: > > I have to build a module that exports only symbol with a given prefix: > in the pre-dh debian/rules , something as > > CFLAGS="$(cflags) -Wl,--version-script,debian/.version" > > was use. I cannot figure out how to proceed within

Bug#685836: RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 reintroduction

2012-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Jerome, Is your goal to add this package to wheezy ? The package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-25 01:46 appears to have more minimal differences with 1.92-14. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

Processed: RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 [ITP] [UPSTREAM] [RESOLVED] [REINTRODUCTION]

2012-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 685836 wishlist Bug #685836 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 [ITP] [UPSTREAM] [RESOLVED] [REINTRODUCTION] Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: libpam-ssh: block ITP 664177 by RFS 685836

2012-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 664177 by 685836 Bug #664177 [wnpp] ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys Bug #685042 [wnpp] ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys Bug #685614 [wnpp] ITP: libpam-ssh -- Authenticate using SSH keys 664177 was not blocked by

Bug#685836: RFS: libpam-ssh/1.97+ds-1 [ITP] [UPSTREAM] [RESOLVED] [REINTRODUCTION]

2012-08-24 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-ssh" * Package name: libpam-ssh Version : 1.97+ds-1 Upstream Author : Wolfgang Rosenauer * URL : http://sourceforge.net/pro

Re: it's free license?

2012-08-24 Thread Vincent Cheng
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote: > Dear Mentors, > > I want to know the following license is free or not: > // > Copyright © 2002-2010 Nikolaus Gebhardt > > This software is provided ‘as-is’, without any express or imp

dh machinery and module how to export only given symbol

2012-08-24 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello: I have to build a module that exports only symbol with a given prefix: in the pre-dh debian/rules , something as CFLAGS="$(cflags) -Wl,--version-script,debian/.version" was use. I cannot figure out how to proceed within the dh machinery. Any hint is welcome. Thanks in advance,

Bug#678107: RFS: acsccid/1.0.4-1

2012-08-24 Thread Godfrey Chung
Hi Bart | Files in second .deb but not in first | - | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/pcsc/drivers/ifd-acsccid.bundle/Contents/Linux/libacsccid.so | | Files in first .deb but not in second | - | -rw-r--r

it's free license?

2012-08-24 Thread Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
Dear Mentors, I want to know the following license is free or not: // Copyright © 2002-2010 Nikolaus Gebhardt This software is provided ‘as-is’, without any express or implied warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damage

Bug#685573: RFS: vfu/4.12-1

2012-08-24 Thread William Vera
Hi Bart, On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:43 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > Hi William, > > I had a look at your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-08-22 01:48. Thanks! > > Please complete debian/copyright, see for example vslib/pcre/pcre.h. I just updated debian/copyright > > Was the addition of

Bug#683184: RFS: suckless-tools/39-1 [ITA]

2012-08-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
You create the empty suckless-tools_${version}.orig.tar.gz tarball in the wrong directory. Why do you redirect tar's stderr to /dev/null? I recommend passing these options to tar, so that the user's name/group/umask are not leaked: --owner root --group root --mode a+rX Have you seen #685611

Bug#678107: RFS: acsccid/1.0.4-1

2012-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Godfrey, I rebuilt your package at mentors uploaded there on 2012-06-19 08:06, and I found this difference : | Files in second .deb but not in first | - | -rw-r--r-- root/root /usr/lib/pcsc/drivers/ifd-acsccid.bundle/Contents/Linux/libacsccid.so

Bug#685635: RFS: fonts-pecita/3.4-1

2012-08-24 Thread Bart Martens
The version available for download upstream is 3.4.1, not 3.4. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120824164353.ga27...@master.debian.org

Bug#667511: RFS: updeb/1.0.3 [NEW] -- Non-interactive upgrade Debian system

2012-08-24 Thread Vladimir Stavrinov
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > would you mind making one of such exemplar reports publicly available > for the demonstration purposes? ;) http://sourceforge.net/projects/updeb/files/updeb-report_example.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-24 Thread David Cho-Lerat
Hi all, Depending on your own ambition there are several approaches. The easiest and simplest way is to use "dpkg-deb -b" which does right what you asked for. A slightly more advanced way would be to use tools like checkinstall(1) which require some Makefile which installs files to the file syste

Re: Handling of sponsorship requests

2012-08-24 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
Le 24/08/2012 à 03:55, Bart Martens écrivit : > > where else would you suggest putting it > > to make sure people, well, read it? :) > > It would be nice to have a link to the freeze policy there. > http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Done! Feel free to suggest an alternative wor