Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 07:08:23 +
with message-id <20121203070823.gb7...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #670176,
regarding RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package sponsorship-requests
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'sponsorship-requests'
Limit currently set to 'package':'sponsorship-requests'
> unarchive 670176
> reopen 670176
Bug #670176 {Done: Bart Martens } [sp
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 06:23:50 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #670176,
regarding RFS: kismet/2011.03.R2-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683473 RFS: podget/0.6.8-12
Bug #683473 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: podget/0.6.8-8
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-12' from 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-8'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
68347
Your message dated Mon, 3 Dec 2012 05:06:55 +
with message-id <20121203050655.ga7...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: podget/0.6.8-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #694968,
regarding RFS: podget/0.6.8-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 03 Dec 2012 04:20:37 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
has caused the Debian Bug report #682893,
regarding RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 682893 RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)
Bug #682893 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: freefoam/0.1.2-1 (for experimental)
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: freefoam/0.1.0+dfsg-1 (for experimental)' from 'RFS:
freefoam/0.1.2-1 (for experim
I don't intend to sponsor this package but here is a review.
If you are contacting upstream as a result of this review, please
point them at our upstream guide:
http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide
This package is not suitable for Debian main yet, here are the blockers:
tpd_common/glf.* have a
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
>> verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
>> packages that have gon
Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
> verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versioning of
> packages that have gone through tpu recently (e.g. cdbs, underscore,
> etc.).
Sure
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
>> > because
>> > the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
James,
Thanks. I have downloaded and I will look.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50bbca13.1070...@periapt.co.uk
Hi Mike,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
> > because
> > the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
> > 4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable chang
> Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, because
> the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
> 4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I did a t-p-u
> update like this (without the deb7u suffix) yesterday (for fossil
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "podget".
There has been an older version included in the Debian repositories but
it is a
little out of date. This package is an update that covers all that has
been
fixed in the last 5 ye
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 06:23:47PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
Thanks for your reply (and thanks gregor for the upload).
> > > lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
> > > might be a problem is som
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 17:08:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > lftp hasn't been uploaded or removed, so this bug shouldn't be closed. It
> > might be a problem is some script, because mentors has 2 versions of lftp: a
> > version for sid, and a version for testing-proposed-updates.
> However, are you
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 12:59:44PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
> > From: Bart Martens
> > To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org
> > Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 692561 by 694940
Bug #692561 [wnpp] ITP: toped -- Toped is a cross-platform IC layout editor
692561 was not blocked by any bugs.
692561 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 692561: 694940
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683473 RFS: podget/0.6.8-8
Bug #683473 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: podget/0.6.8-5
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-8' from 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-5'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683473:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 671660 RFS: calendar-exchange-provider/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- MS Exchange
> support for iceowl-extension
Bug #671660 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: calendar-exchange-provider/2.2.3-1
[ITP] -- MS Exchange support for iceowl-extension
Changed Bug t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 687620 RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP]
Bug #687620 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-3 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-4 [ITP]' from 'RFS: udpxy/1.0.23-3
[ITP]'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Your message dated Sun, 2 Dec 2012 16:27:01 +0100
with message-id <20121202152701.gy19...@jadzia.comodo.priv.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#694872: RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #694872,
regarding RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that
* Giulio Paci , 2012-12-01, 20:45:
I decided to push my git repository to collab-maint. You can find it
here:
Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/yamcha.git
Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/yamcha.git
Great. If you don't keep the package on mentors.d.n
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "toped"
Package name: toped
Version : 0.9.8.1-r2211-1
Upstream Author :
Svilen Krustev - s...@toped.org.uk
Sergey Gaitukevich - gaitukev...@toped.org.uk
Arm
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #694872 {Done: Bart Martens }
[sponsorship-requests] RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #694872 to the same values
previously set
--
694872: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=69
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:45:08AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
> From: Bart Martens
> To: 694872-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
>
> Package lftp has been removed from mentors.
l
Your message dated Sun, 02 Dec 2012 04:20:40 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #694872,
regarding RFS: lftp/4.3.8-1.1 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 683473 RFS: podget/0.6.8-5
Bug #683473 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: podget/0.6.7-1
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: podget/0.6.8-5' from 'RFS: podget/0.6.7-1'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683473:
On 26 Nov 2012, at 21:37, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> 1.) I didn't notice it first time but the last paragraph of the long
> description is a bit like advertising.
I see what you mean. I've removed some of it and reworded the rest. Does that
look OK now?
> 2.) The upstream changelog issue is stil
30 matches
Mail list logo
