Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-18 Thread Markus Schade
Hi Gianfranco On 17.08.2015 at 16:41 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 1) > > # upstream does not sign releases > #yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature That is a commented out leftover. I have removed it anyway so other won't think it is still used like you ;-) > 2) sbin/yadifad/ins

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Control: owner -1 ! Hi Markus, Following my review: 1) # upstream does not sign releases #yadifa source: debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature ls upstream/signing-key.asc upstream/signing-key.asc which one is correct? 2) sbin/yadifad/install-sh not mentioned in copyright (and every insta

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-17 Thread Markus Schade
Hi everyone, On 16.08.2015 at 22:53 Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Christian Kastner , 2015-08-16, 19:08: >> debian/rules: >> - I believe the "export DH_OPTIONS [...] to make magic work" can be >> dropped. I think this is a remnant from a time long past; I can't find >> any reference to this in recent docu

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-16 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Christian Kastner , 2015-08-16, 19:08: debian/rules: - I believe the "export DH_OPTIONS [...] to make magic work" can be dropped. I think this is a remnant from a time long past; I can't find any reference to this in recent documentation. dh(1), for example, makes no mention of this. Second

Re: Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-08-16 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2015-08-16 13:43, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Christian Kastner , 2015-08-15, 23:57: The Vcs-Git URL should use the git:// protocol specifier, and you could add a Vcs-Browser URL pointing to the github package, like so: -Vcs-Git: https://github.com/asciiprod/yadifa.git +Vcs-

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-08-16 Thread Christian Kastner
Hi Markus, On 2015-06-05 13:52, Markus Schade wrote: > New package for yadifa 2.1.0 is available > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yadifa/yadifa_2.1.0-1.dsc > > It would be great if someone could sponsor this package. I think > the history of this bugreport proves that the package

Re: Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-08-16 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Christian Kastner , 2015-08-15, 23:57: The Vcs-Git URL should use the git:// protocol specifier, and you could add a Vcs-Browser URL pointing to the github package, like so: -Vcs-Git: https://github.com/asciiprod/yadifa.git +Vcs-Git: git://github.com/asciiprod/yadifa.git The original URL

Re: Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-08-15 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2015-08-15 16:17, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Christian Kastner , 2014-04-09, 20:50: >> The Vcs-Git URL should use the git:// protocol specifier, and you >> could add a Vcs-Browser URL pointing to the github package, like so: >> >> -Vcs-Git: https://github.com/asciiprod/yadifa.git >> +Vcs-Git: git:/

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2015-08-15 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Christian Kastner , 2014-04-09, 20:50: The Vcs-Git URL should use the git:// protocol specifier, and you could add a Vcs-Browser URL pointing to the github package, like so: -Vcs-Git: https://github.com/asciiprod/yadifa.git +Vcs-Git: git://github.com/asciiprod/yadifa.git The original URL

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-06-05 Thread Markus Schade
On 03/05/2015 04:32 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:24 +0100, Markus Schade wrote: >> And I have asked them to do so, of course. Likewise with the other >> things you mentioned (e.g. signing their releases). > > Ah, good. I wasn't sure if you had done that, sorry. > >> My point is

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-03-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:24 +0100, Markus Schade wrote: > Yes, I know that. ;-) > And I have asked them to do so, of course. Likewise with the other > things you mentioned (e.g. signing their releases). Ah, good. I wasn't sure if you had done that, sorry. > My point is that I cannot make upstrea

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-03-05 Thread Markus Schade
On 03/05/2015 04:16 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Markus Schade wrote: > You could forward the code quality issues upstream as suggested by the > Debian social contract: > > https://www.debian.org/social_contract Yes, I know that. ;-) And I have asked them to do so, of c

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-03-05 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Markus Schade wrote: > But then again, I am just the packager not the developer. So I can do > little about the code quality. You could forward the code quality issues upstream as suggested by the Debian social contract: https://www.debian.org/social_contract --

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.5-1 [ITP]

2015-03-05 Thread Markus Schade
Dear Paul, dear mentors, Thank you for your extensive review. I won't go into detail for every item you have mentioned, but I believe that many if not most issues have been dealt with. But then again, I am just the packager not the developer. So I can do little about the code quality. All of my

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.0-1 [ITP]

2014-11-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Markus Schade wrote: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yadifa/yadifa_2.0.0-1.dsc I don't intend to sponsor this but here is a quick review... > I have been able to establish contact with upstream and while the > website may not be updated frequently

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/2.0.0-1 [ITP]

2014-11-25 Thread Markus Schade
Dear mentors, I am again looking for a sponsor for my package "yadifa". Now with the new release 2.0.0 YADIFA is a "Yet Another DNS Implementation For All", a DNS server written by the people of the EURid registry. The URL of the package is: http://mentors.debian.net/package/yadifa The respecti

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2014-04-11 Thread Markus Schade
On 04/09/2014 09:00 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: > Oh, I missed something here: you are using the substitution variable > ${Description}, but you are not setting it anywhere, which results in > half-empty descriptions (see the output in > debian/libdns*/DEBIAN/control). See deb-substvars(5). Agai

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2014-04-09 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2014-04-09 20:50, Christian Kastner wrote: >>> debian/control >>> == > > I like your approach with a common description provided through a > substitution variable! Very efficient. Oh, I missed something here: you are using the substitution variable ${Description}, but you are not s

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2014-04-09 Thread Christian Kastner
On 2014-04-09 09:26, Markus Schade wrote: > thanks for the review, Christian! Glad I can help :-) Here is some further feedback: >> debian/control >> == >> If you're using a VCS for your packaging, Vcs-* URLs would be nice (to >> simplify contributing to your packaging). You can als

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2014-04-09 Thread Markus Schade
Hi, thanks for the review, Christian! On 04/05/2014 06:16 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: > AFAIK bind9 only stores run-time data in /var/cache/bind (from dynamic > DNS updates, etc). bind9's zone files are in /etc/bind/zones. > > [...] > > I'd either go with /etc/yadifa or /var/lib/yadifa. Check

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2014-04-05 Thread Christian Kastner
Hi, On 2014-03-18 22:34, Markus Schade wrote:> However there is one question, which I am not sure, what is correct. > Upstream uses /var/zones as base for its zone files. My guess was > that this is not the proper location for such files in Debian. So I > changed it to /var/cache/yadifa like bind9

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa/1.0.3-1 [ITP]

2014-03-18 Thread Markus Schade
Dear mentors, I have made some corrections/improvements and re-uploaded the package again. However there is one question, which I am not sure, what is correct. Upstream uses /var/zones as base for its zone files. My guess was that this is not the proper location for such files in Debian. So I cha

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa-1.0.3-1

2014-03-18 Thread Markus Schade
Hello, since Martijn has not followed up on this bug for the last months, I would like to ask if it is okay to have this bug assigned to me. I have packaged the current version 1.0.3 and uploaded the package(s) to mentors.debian.net seeking sponsorship: http://mentors.debian.net/package/yadifa

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa

2012-10-09 Thread Bart Martens
Hi Martijn, Please name the package yadifa-1.0.1-1 at mentors to yadifa. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121010045522.ga15

Bug#683120: RFS: yadifa-1.0.1-1/2116-1

2012-07-28 Thread martijn cielen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yadifa-1.0.1-1" * Package name: yadifa-1.0.1-1 Version : 2116-1 Upstream Author : yadifa.eu * URL : yadifa.eu * License : BSD Section