Dear Niko,
måndag den 22 november 2010 klockan 12:47 skrev Niko Tyni detta:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:38:08PM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>
> > I could find good use of some advice on Debconf usage.
> > The recent automated package upgrade tests, conducted
> > by Lucas Nussbaum, hava re
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:38:08PM +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> I could find good use of some advice on Debconf usage.
> The recent automated package upgrade tests, conducted
> by Lucas Nussbaum, hava revealed that my package Webfs
> fails to upgrade properly from stable (1.21-5.1) to
> te
Hi,
On Sonntag, 21. November 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> If both those tests are true, you can be pretty sure that a user can be
> prompted (on stderr, blah) and you can get a response on stdin.
Don't do this, or rather: do it right: "Prompting must be done by
communicating through a
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> In <20101120223808.ga15...@mea.homelinux.org>, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> >Question: Is there some mechanism I can use in the postinst
> > script that lets me determine whether the upgrade
> > is being conducted in non-interac
In <20101120223808.ga15...@mea.homelinux.org>, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
>Question: Is there some mechanism I can use in the postinst
> script that lets me determine whether the upgrade
> is being conducted in non-interactive mode?
First, you should *assume* non-interactive mode
Dear all,
I could find good use of some advice on Debconf usage.
The recent automated package upgrade tests, conducted
by Lucas Nussbaum, hava revealed that my package Webfs
fails to upgrade properly from stable (1.21-5.1) to
testing (1.21+ds1-6). I have filed an RC bug against
myself on this matt
6 matches
Mail list logo