Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id <87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding RFS: burp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id <87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding RFS: burp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id <87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding RFS: burp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:39:01 +0100
with message-id <87ipjb2hu2@deep-thought.43-1.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#659537: RFS: burp
has caused the Debian Bug report #659537,
regarding (no subject)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Dear mentors,
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspsms-t/aspsms-t_1.3.0-1.dsc
Changes since last upload:
* lib/ASPSMS/Storage.pm: Change to IO::File functions.
* lib/ASPSMS/Storage.pm: Closes github issue: #1
* README: Update documentation
Thanks, -Marco
signatu
* Ben Finney , 2012-02-13, 13:40:
I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
confuse some Debian robots ?
It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a
release of the package, since
Le Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:53:45AM +0100, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> * Ben Finney , 2012-02-13, 13:40:
> >>I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my
> >>first version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ?
> >>Will it confuse some Debian robots ?
> >
> >It's fine. I consider
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Ben Finney , 2012-02-13, 13:40:
>>> I want to keep trace of it in the d/changelog by keeping my first
>>> version entry and adding a second entry. Can I do that ? Will it
>>> confuse some Debian robots ?
>>
>> It's fine. I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.n
Hi,
> Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
> practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
> world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
> sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
> announced,
On 02/13/2012 07:14 AM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
+1
--
Stephen M. Webb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-m
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trash-cli".
I talked with Steve Stalcup (the current maintainer, but he's not a
DD), with Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (who packaged trash-cli previously on
mentors) and with Andrea Francia (the upstream author) and I packaged
the latest ups
Boris Pek writes:
> Hi,
>
>> Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
>> practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
>> world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
>> sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in
Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy écrivit :
>
> ${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
> proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
> worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
Hi,
This scheme is something I was thinking about doing
Hi,
just a comment on this: I suspect a multiarch issue and
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/06/msg2.html
"Multiarch handling of header files (/usr/include) will require
more per-package attention, ..."
so Luis is asking for some hints how to deal with this like th
> Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
> within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
> (see my "when it makes sense" comment above).
>
> But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
> prefer a new version on mentors
Dear mentors,
Pierre Habouzit (the former maintainer) uploaded the changes to the VCS.
(http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/tokyocabinet.git;a=summary)
So DDs, please go ahead and please sponsor the upload.
Best regards,
coldtobi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
Boris Pek writes:
>> Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
>> within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
>> (see my "when it makes sense" comment above).
>>
>> But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
>> prefe
Nicolas Dandrimont writes:
> Le 13/02/2012 à 13:14, Gergely Nagy écrivit :
>>
>> ${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
>> proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
>> worlds with as little of the worst as possible.
>
> Hi,
>
> This scheme
Hello,
What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
debian directory ?
I've not found any documentation about it, except for debian/rules.
Regards,
Fred.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote:
> What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
> debian directory ?
Usual 644/755 I suppose, what makes you think about different perms?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Mail original -
De: "Andrey Rahmatullin"
À: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 13 Février 2012 16:16:12
Objet: Re: Files permission in the debian directory
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote:
> What are the recommended permissions for all the fil
fre...@free.fr writes:
> What I especially like to know if this should be group-writable, but
> maybe it's not important.
They should not be. There is no reason to use anything but 644/755,
respectively.
--
|8]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
Ok, thanks.
- Mail original -
De: "Gergely Nagy"
À: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Envoyé: Lundi 13 Février 2012 17:35:37
Objet: Re: Files permission in the debian directory
fre...@free.fr writes:
> What I especially like to know if this should be group-writable, but
> maybe it's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 13.02.2012 17:55, fre...@free.fr wrote:
> They should not be. There is no reason to use anything but 644/755,
> respectively.
Except debehelper in compatibility mode 9. There, debhelper
configuration files can be scripts (as you know), which a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nginx".
It's a backport of the package which is available on Debian Testing.
* Package name: nginx
* Version : 1.1.14-1~bpo60+1
* Section : httpd
It builds those binary packages:
nginx - small, but very powerful a
hello jasem,
i'm not a debian developer myself, so i can't help you with uploading,
nor should you rely solely on my opinion here, but i hope these comments
are helpful both to you and the developer reviewing your package for
upload:
* you already require debhelper 6, is there any reason you don'
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mpd-sima".
* Package name: mpd-sima
Version : 0.9.0-1~1.gbp3e591f
Upstream Author : Jack Kaliko
* URL : http://codingteam.net/project/sima
* License :
* Charles Plessy , 2012-02-13, 20:07:
I consider uploading the package to ‘mentors.debian.net’ a release of
the package, since at that point interested people (e.g. reviewers)
can rely on it, and the version should refer uniquely to what I
uploaded at that time.
Be aware, though, that some pe
hello raúl,
i'm not a debian developer myself, so i can't help you with uploading,
nor should you rely solely on my opinion here, but i hope these comments
are helpful both to you and the developer reviewing your package for
upload:
* as your upstream tarball contains the whole python-cha
Arno Töll writes:
> Except debehelper in compatibility mode 9. There, debhelper
> configuration files can be scripts (as you know), which are determined
> by the +x bit.
That's covered by 755. But executable dh files are not for the faint of
heart, nor for beginners who need to ask these questio
* installing by just copying python files to /usr/share/themole is far
from elegant.
Uh? This is the idiomatic way to install Python applications.
there is no byte-compilation of files, unless themole gets invoked by
root (which in term is a bad thing itself as /usr/share gets written to
at r
Le Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr a écrit :
>
>
> What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
> debian directory ?
> I've not found any documentation about it, except for debian/rules.
Dear Fred,
the Dpkg source format version 1.0 does n
Hello List:
I am beginning to play with pbuilder by following th maint-guide:
right now my p[ersonal ]building is polluted by my CONFIG_SITE:
what is the best way to discard it from the pbuilder machinery ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debi
Dear all,
I'm preparing matterial and need to notify command in debian.I guess
it's renamed, do you know its new name?
--mohsen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello Again:
It appears that CONFIG_SITE is used by dpkg-builpackage:
the issue can be easily overcome by using debuild instead as debuild unset
CONFIG_SITE.
Can pbuilder use debuild instead of dpkg-builpackage ?
Thanks,
Jerome
On 14/02/12 03:57, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List:
I am beginni
Hi:
On 14/02/12 05:16, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello Again:
It appears that CONFIG_SITE is used by dpkg-builpackage:
the issue can be easily overcome by using debuild instead as debuild unset
CONFIG_SITE.
Can pbuilder use debuild instead of dpkg-builpackage ?
This is a silly question as pbuilde
36 matches
Mail list logo
