Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 582522 please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream
> more clearly
Bug #582522 [ghostscript] libjpeg8: Please provide variant compiled with
#define D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU 64
Changed Bug title to 'plea
retitle 582522 please document D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU deviation from upstream more
clearly
# documentation
severity 582522 minor
found 582522 ghostscript/9.05~dfsg-6
quit
Hi Bastien,
Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> Now that README.Debian has some comment about the case, time to
> close ?
All the READM
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 582522 ghostscript 8.64~dfsg-2
Bug #582522 [src:libjpeg8] libjpeg8: Please provide variant compiled with
#define D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU 64
Bug reassigned from package 'src:libjpeg8' to 'ghostscript'.
Bug No lo
reassign 582522 ghostscript 8.64~dfsg-2
quit
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
>> Honestly, unless you provide evidence that PS files that include invalid
>> jpeg-encoded data are still in use, I am not going to include two new
>> packages
>> to support non-standard compliant data i
Bill Allombert wrote:
> Honestly, unless you provide evidence that PS files that include invalid
> jpeg-encoded data are still in use, I am not going to include two new packages
> to support non-standard compliant data in Debian, and in any case, I doubt the
> FTP master would let me.
Makes sens
