Developer workflow and DVCS (was: Leaving DPMT?)

2009-02-27 Thread Ben Finney
[re-sending as a followup to an older thread] I see this discussion focussing on Subversion versus Git; I wish with this message to point out that's a false dichotomy, as not all DVCSen are necessarily like Git. To do so, I'll engage in a little advocacy for Bazaar http://bazaar-vcs.org/>. I hope

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Ben Finney
Ondrej Certik writes: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ben Finney > wrote: > > Certainly, if someone can point me to the right thread. > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=debian+python+git+svn&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= > > it's the 4th link: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-py

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Sandro Tosi writes: > >> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:11, Ben Finney wrote: >> > I see this discussion focussing exclusively on Subversion versus >> > Git; I wish with this message to point out that not all DVCSen are >> > necessarily like Git.

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Ben Finney
Sandro Tosi writes: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:11, Ben Finney wrote: > > I see this discussion focussing exclusively on Subversion versus > > Git; I wish with this message to point out that not all DVCSen are > > necessarily like Git. > > WTF?! As Ondrej said just some hours ago: I didn't se

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 01:11, Ben Finney wrote: > I see this discussion focussing exclusively on Subversion versus Git; > I wish with this message to point out that not all DVCSen are > necessarily like Git. WTF?! As Ondrej said just some hours ago: On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 16:41, Ondrej Certik

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Ben Finney
I see this discussion focussing exclusively on Subversion versus Git; I wish with this message to point out that not all DVCSen are necessarily like Git. To do so, I'll engage in a little advocacy for Bazaar. I hope people can be open to discussion about relative merits of tools. Stephan Peijnik

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Stephan Peijnik wrote: > First of all, I do not consider myself to be a 'major' contributor to > the DPMT either. > > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 15:07 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> No, what I said was: >> >> - I see no need to move to git as a team >> - I can't afford to

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Stephan Peijnik
First of all, I do not consider myself to be a 'major' contributor to the DPMT either. On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 15:07 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > No, what I said was: > > - I see no need to move to git as a team > - I can't afford to download all the git repos for packages I want to > modify once I

Re: Leaving DPMT?

2009-02-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 22:11, Ondrej Certik wrote: > Currently I think Sandro is the last major contributor for DPMT who > wants to stay in svn. No, what I said was: - I see no need to move to git as a team - I can't afford to download all the git repos for packages I want to modify once - My p

Re: Removing w32 specific Python code from a package

2009-02-27 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Stephan Peijnik [Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:07:40 +0100]: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:27 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]: > > > Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely > > > free anyways I thought I could get rid of this p

Re: Removing w32 specific Python code from a package

2009-02-27 Thread Stephan Peijnik
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:27 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Stephan Peijnik [Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:46:58 +0100]: > > > Now as python-pyglet needs to be repacked because it is not entirely > > free anyways I thought I could get rid of this problem by simply > > removing the w32-specifics when repacka