On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 at 20:31:06 +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > File "faker/providers/date_time/__init__.py", line 403, in
> > date_time_this_century
> > return cls.date_time_between_dates(now, next_century_start, tzinfo)
> > File "faker/providers/date_time/__init__.py", line 381, in
> > date
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Brian May wrote:
> Help in fixing this RC bug would be appreciated. I have forwarded this
> upstream, however need a quick fix for the Debian package (not sure but
> suspect it might be too late for stretch).
>
> Unfortunately, not sure where to start. I don't understand this
To: debian-python mailing list
Help in fixing this RC bug would be appreciated. I have forwarded this
upstream, however need a quick fix for the Debian package (not sure but
suspect it might be too late for stretch).
Unfortunately, not sure where to start. I don't understand this
date_time_this_c
[Luke W Faraone, 2017-01-30]
> In bug #744741[1], we have a report where a lack of ``egg-info`` metadata
> breaks
> both ``pip``'s installation detection and packages that use ``pkg_resources``
> to
> discover dependencies.
>
> Usually, the answer would be simple: ship the ``egg-info`` metadata
Scott Kitterman writes:
> OK. Where do I find documentation to give this a try?
I used the following documentation:
http://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.patches.html
--
Brian May
5 matches
Mail list logo