Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-29 Thread Joel Rosdahl
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Federico Di Gregorio writes: > > On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > > > 3. As the policy mandates, I have made the packages depend on > > > > > >python (>= 2.1), python (<< 2.2) > > > > > >Lintian doesn't really like that.

Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-29 Thread Joel Rosdahl
Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My only suggestion is, if you are at all in doubt about supporting > multiple versions of python, don't use the 2.1.1 "support only the > default" packaging option, instead use the 2.1.3-1. "multiple > versioned packages" option. > > Note that even if

Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-28 Thread Donovan Baarda
G'day, On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 10:34:05PM +0100, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > Hi, > > I have now finished Debianizing eGenix mx BASE (based on patch done by > Federico Di Gregorio, see bug#56): > > http://www.lemburg.com/files/python/eGenix-mx-Extensions.html > > The upstream maintainer of "th

Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-28 Thread Matthias Klose
Federico Di Gregorio writes: > On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > > Questions: > > > > 1. Does anyone need Python 1.5 versions of these packages? > > > >Packages I have found that are associated with some of the mx > >packages are: > > > >python-mysqldb (Suggests:

Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-28 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:55, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > i plan to drop support for 1.5 from psycopg (at least in debian > > builds) when we'll have a zope for python 2.1 in the archive. > > Okay. Will this happen in woody? i have seen an url to pr

Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-28 Thread Joel Rosdahl
Federico Di Gregorio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > > python-egenix-mx-base-dev > > note that the location of the header files was wrong in my patch > (/usr/include/pythonx.y/mx is much better, imho.) Agreed and changed. > > 1. Does anyone n

Re: Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-28 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
On Sun, 2001-10-28 at 22:34, Joel Rosdahl wrote: > Hi, > > I have now finished Debianizing eGenix mx BASE (based on patch done by > Federico Di Gregorio, see bug#56): > > http://www.lemburg.com/files/python/eGenix-mx-Extensions.html > > The upstream maintainer of "the mx packages" (mxdat

Packaging python-egenix-mx*

2001-10-28 Thread Joel Rosdahl
Hi, I have now finished Debianizing eGenix mx BASE (based on patch done by Federico Di Gregorio, see bug#56): http://www.lemburg.com/files/python/eGenix-mx-Extensions.html The upstream maintainer of "the mx packages" (mxdatetime, mxstack, mxtools, ...) now distributes everything in one s