Bug#733266: pu: package whois/5.1.0

2013-12-27 Thread Marco d'Itri
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu whois in stable should be updated due to the many changes in the database. I think that the smartest choice would be to reupload the latest release, once it will have transitioned to testing. A

Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)

2013-12-27 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2013-12-27 21:08, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> We are happy to use results from other automated tests (like >> autopkgtest [DEP8]) in the same way, as soon as someone runs them on >> the entire archive and gives us a machine

Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)

2013-12-27 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > We are happy to use results from other automated tests (like > autopkgtest [DEP8]) in the same way, as soon as someone runs them on > the entire archive and gives us a machine-readable list of the > results. > > [DEP8] http://de

Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)

2013-12-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:53:32 +0100 Peter Palfrader wrote: > Arm* is a slightly smaller issue because we have no way to remotely > power cycle the machines Linaro may be able to help here. We've developed software to allow remote interaction with a selection of APC PDU units and this is routinely

Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)

2013-12-27 Thread Andreas Barth
* Steve McIntyre (st...@einval.com) [131227 03:17]: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > >On a related note, DSA have concerns with the current arm* and mips* > >hardware. While there have been promises of new hardware to replace > >some of the current buggy machi

Re: Bits from the release team (freeze time line)

2013-12-27 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Fri, 27 Dec 2013, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 06:08:03PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > >On a related note, DSA have concerns with the current arm* and mips* > >hardware. While there have been promises of new hardware to replace > >some of the current buggy machines, the