HI Michael,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Right now the Condor package only builds a fraction of the built-in
> functionality (although what is built is already quite comprehensive
> for
> the task of a batch queuing system). I'm working on enabling
> build-time
Michael Hanke writes:
>
> Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are
> enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit
> the issue.
I'll be at debconf in Managua, and I would certainly attend such a
BoF. I also have some interest in the continuin
On Thu, 10 May 2012 09:49:11 +0200
Michael Hanke wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are
> enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit
> the issue.
>
> What is the status of similar software in Debian (GridEngine, Slurm,
> ...)?
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:38:57PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> So having Condor certainly makes sense, but I think we have several
> mature (from a upstream POV) batch queueing systems in Debian now, but
> might lack maintenance personell.
For Condor the situation is very nice in the respect. Th
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't attend Debconf this year, but maybe there are
> enough people interested in the topic to have a follow-up BoF to revisit
> the issue.
I won't be there, either.
Note that the Grenoble workshop draft agenda
Hi,
some of you might still remember the Batch Queuing Systems BoF at
Debconf10, where we briefly discussed the past/present/future of this
software in Debian. We talked about the lack of maintainers, and possible
strategies to consolidate our efforts.
During this meeting I've learned about Condo
6 matches
Mail list logo
