On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:18:28PM +0200, Jan Luehr wrote:
> Well, looking back at woody, kernel updates appear infrequently and not that
> often. I can remeber that we asked for a kernel-update but nothing came
> around.
I can't speak for the stable security team; but I suspect it was a
lack of
*> I found you in a search and thought you could help. I am unable to get in
> touch with the webmaster at qmail. If you can answer this question it would
> be
> greatly appreciated. Many thanks for your help. diane
>
> "We have been receiving mail from several people being sent under differe
Holger Mense wrote:
>> the Mozilla team has recently released new versions of Firefox, Mozilla
>> Suite, Thunderbird, which also fix several security issues
>> (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html)
>>
>> How far are these issues affected by the Debian packages? Will
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:02:20AM +0100, James Davis wrote:
> Actually, the release of Thunderbird which fixes these vulnerabilities
> (1.5.0.2) has not completed testing and is not a 'release' yet. The
> vulnerability report is confusing, in that it implies that Thunderbird
> 1.5.0.2 should be av
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:18:28PM +0200, Jan Luehr wrote:
Btw. Why do a lot of DSAs care about oldstable, while kernel-updates avoid
woody?
Because the kernel build process for woody is even worse than for sarge.
Mike Stone
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:18:28PM +0200, Jan Luehr wrote:
> Btw. Why do a lot of DSAs care about oldstable, while kernel-updates avoid
> woody?
Because building kernels is hard for Sarge and very hard for Woody.
I seem to recall Joey asking for volunteers to help work on kernels
a good fe
6 matches
Mail list logo
