associated
function wasn't found in kernel-source-2.4.20.
[1] = deb http://legolas.alternex.com.br/~stratus/debian/ ./
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
associated
function wasn't found in kernel-source-2.4.20.
[1] = deb http://legolas.alternex.com.br/~stratus/debian/ ./
Cheers,
--
Gustavo Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt line:
> deb http://people.debian.org/~jfs/nessus 2.0.0/
> [1] http://www.nessus.org/nessus_2_0.html
Hi jfs,
What's the relationship between these nessus 2.0 packages and the nessus
2.0.1 packages[1] of Josip Rodin at the experimental release?
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/e
apt line:
> deb http://people.debian.org/~jfs/nessus 2.0.0/
> [1] http://www.nessus.org/nessus_2_0.html
Hi jfs,
What's the relationship between these nessus 2.0 packages and the nessus
2.0.1 packages[1] of Josip Rodin at the experimental release?
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/e
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
>
> Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick B
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>
> > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable.
>
> Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only possible, but easy.
Nick B
y main argument ageinst tripwire is it's pseudo-commercial source.
>
A online database with md5sums of systems:
http://www.knowngoods.org/index.php
The bad thing that they still have only Debian 2.2r5 md5sums.
You can try the file integrity checker of them at:
http://osiris.shmoo.com/
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Woody for i386 with propolice, stackguard or anything
like, good too!
I guess that Debian can support one more kernel flavor, it's so easy.You
can see the previous commented patch called grsecurity, it has PaX and
more interesting features to enhance security without rebuild the entire
system.Comments here?
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for you is apt-pinning feature, you can read more
about it at apt-howto[1].
With the tips you will keep a stable system plus snort from unstable
system and obviously the depends.More easy to keep updated.
[1] =
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get.en.html#s-default-version
This is the section 3.8, check the 3.9 below too.
cya,
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ain argument ageinst tripwire is it's pseudo-commercial source.
>
A online database with md5sums of systems:
http://www.knowngoods.org/index.php
The bad thing that they still have only Debian 2.2r5 md5sums.
You can try the file integrity checker of them at:
http://osiris.shmoo.com/
Woody for i386 with propolice, stackguard or anything
like, good too!
I guess that Debian can support one more kernel flavor, it's so easy.You
can see the previous commented patch called grsecurity, it has PaX and
more interesting features to enhance security without rebuild the entire
system
for you is apt-pinning feature, you can read more
about it at apt-howto[1].
With the tips you will keep a stable system plus snort from unstable
system and obviously the depends.More easy to keep updated.
[1] =
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/apt-howto/ch-apt-get.en.html#s-default-version
gressive to set by default.One "harden" flavor to sarge
with grsecurity patch can be good.Any feedback of d-boot guys?
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GNUpg id: 0x37155778 (try: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net)
I prefer encrypted and signed e-mail.
elve servers running Debian GNU/Linux and i'm using one apt-proxy[3]
and aptwatcher(like cron-apt).
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/cron-apt/
[2] = http://people.debian.org/~ajt/
[3] = http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/
Talking about secpack, is it non-free? I can't see in your mail(Clemens)
the
gressive to set by default.One "harden" flavor to sarge
with grsecurity patch can be good.Any feedback of d-boot guys?
Thanks,
--
Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GNUpg id: 0x37155778 (try: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net)
I prefer encrypted and signed e-mail.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
elve servers running Debian GNU/Linux and i'm using one apt-proxy[3]
and aptwatcher(like cron-apt).
[1] = http://packages.debian.org/cron-apt/
[2] = http://people.debian.org/~ajt/
[3] = http://apt-proxy.sourceforge.net/
Talking about secpack, is it non-free? I can't see in your mail(Clemens)
the
002 00:23:47 +0100
The phrase "The changelog says we are creating 2.4.18, but I thought the
version is 2.4.18-grsec-1.9.4"
occurs because your kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity is adding in EXTRAVERSION on
Makefile: -grsec-1.9.4.For
more information ch
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:29:22 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> >> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
> >>
> >> Ok guy, but apt pin is so
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:29:22 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> >> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
> >>
> >> Ok guy, but apt pin is so
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:37:59 +0100
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> (please fix your line wraps!)
>
> security.debian.org has proftpd_1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1 which does not
> contain this bug, at least not on i386 systems:
>
> fishbowl:~> ncftp lapse.home.madduck.net
> NcFT
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:11:58 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> [...]
> I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
See:
- Add in your sources.list something like:
deb http://http.us.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:37:59 +0100
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> (please fix your line wraps!)
>
> security.debian.org has proftpd_1.2.0pre10-2.0potato1 which does not
> contain this bug, at least not on i386 systems:
>
> fishbowl:~> ncftp lapse.home.madduck.net
> NcF
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:11:58 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> [...]
> I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
See:
- Add in your sources.list something like:
deb http://http.us
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:15:05 +
Simon Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
bye,
--
_
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:15:05 +
Simon Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
bye,
--
_
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0100
"Philippe Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you are the only security-related list I'm subscribed to and
> cryptography has something to do with security, I'm directing this
> question to this list.
> [...]
Hi Philippe,
I'm reading 'Cryptograp
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:50:54 +0100
"Philippe Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you are the only security-related list I'm subscribed to and
> cryptography has something to do with security, I'm directing this
> question to this list.
> [...]
Hi Philippe,
I'm reading 'Cryptogra
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:55:13 +0100
Johan Jacobsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Try stunnel (p.d.o/stunnel) for ssl encryption.
> Hello!
> I am using netsaint_statd on a debian machine and I would like to know
> what I am doing, eg what security holes may this create?
> As I understand it, the
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:55:13 +0100
Johan Jacobsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Try stunnel (p.d.o/stunnel) for ssl encryption.
> Hello!
> I am using netsaint_statd on a debian machine and I would like to know
> what I am doing, eg what security holes may this create?
> As I understand it, th
29 matches
Mail list logo
