> [examples deleted]
Ban them all. None of that crap belongs on a Debian technical list. No
amount of technical input can compensate for the hostility and stupidity
that those kind of posts promote.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to be making a stable ope
g other gcc
installs, and it shouldn't affect any other users unless they
explicitely call it. One thing to check is that the /usr/bin/cc link
doesn't get changed to egcs; if it does, you'll have to reset it using
update-alternatives.
Note the liberal use of weasel terms like "do
got vim-tiny? Or you've picked up one of the i18nized nvi
packages (I'm not sure what priorities they've been assigned.)
Steve
--
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 03-Jul-01, 17:50 (CDT), Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:40:05PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
>
> the benifit is leaving what all 4 of those runlevels do solely up to
> YOU not some so called standards body.
So we should get rid
having 4 identical
runlevels has so far escaped me.
The one thing I've heard so far that seems gratuitous is the separate
library loader.
Steve
--
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)
On 23-Aug-00, 18:17 (CDT), Daniel Barclay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ... Current policy
> > requires that /usr/doc/ exist (possibly as a symlink to
> > /usr/share/doc/).
>
> Then why don't more
On 22-Aug-00, 23:12 (CDT), Daniel Barclay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some packages don't have a documentation directory at all.
Then they are in violation of the Debian policy. Current policy
requires that /usr/doc/ exist (possibly as a symlink to
/usr/share/doc/).
> Some others do but their f
On 24-Apr-00, 23:02 (CDT), Andrew Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using Debian since the old A.out days of Debian 1.0, and I was
> wondering since I am doing development of our company's own Linux
> distribution based on Debian... I have potato as the base and am beginning
> to cust
; >
FWIW, I'm running Oracle 8i (SQL*Plus reports v 8.1.5) with the latest
patches (as of a month ago) on a potato box with no obvious problems, I
don't have any compatibility libs installed.
steve
--
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to thi
On 18-Feb-99, 17:33 (CST), Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I'd like *everybody* think about a possible logo. Please notice the
> > following simple rules:
> >
> > . A logo is NOT a set of letters. Thus the string "Debian" rendered
> > very nice is ... a picture but
> discontent) will turn my efforts to that.
The Debian distribution doesn't need 'fixing', and I really hope that
you keep your promise about this being the last time.
Bruce: Don't back down to this paranoid jerk. Just hope he goes away.
Stev
11 matches
Mail list logo
