Toni Mueller writes:
> I am uncomfortable with this wording:
>
> > * Active contributors of non-packaging work, which share Debian values
>
> s/which/who/, imho. Are any native speakers around?
My opinion as a NSoE matches yours on this point.
--
\“Telling pious lies to trusting child
Hi,
On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli
wrote:
> in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
> non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
> Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last
> forever, I fee
Hi,
On 18/09/10 16:43, Toni Mueller wrote:
> On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli
> wrote:
>> in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
>> non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
>> Since it was also part of my platform an
Hi,
On Tue, 14.09.2010 at 17:53:46 +0900, Stefano Zacchiroli
wrote:
> in recent events I've attended as DPL, the topic of welcoming
> non-packaging contributors as project members has been a recurring one.
> Since it was also part of my platform and since DPL terms don't last
> forever, I fee
Dear Zack,
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I'm hereby introducing two changes:
>
> Even better, now with attachments!
There is yet another pronoun I have missed. Please find a patch
atta
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > My question was basicly if you wanted to make that change
> > at that time. My interpretation is that you didn't propose
> > to change it at that time, but that you would do it at some
> > later time.
> >
> > The question was
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I'm hereby introducing two changes:
Even better, now with attachments!
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Quando
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:42:18PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Kurt, my inclination was to consider this change as falling under
> > Constitution §A.1.3 as a change that "does not alter the meaning" of the
> > proposal.
>
> That would be A.1.6?
Yes, totally, sorry for the typo.
> My question w
8 matches
Mail list logo
