>So, if the weight of the filter itself is a 5 and the e-mail fails one
>of the rules in the filter file, which also has a weight of a 5, then
>the test produces a weight of 10, correct?
That is correct.
>Weight must be used for this test, correct?
No. You can always use a weight of 0 anywher
So, if the weight of the filter itself is a 5 and the e-mail fails one
of the rules in the filter file, which also has a weight of a 5, then
the test produces a weight of 10, correct?
Weight must be used for this test, correct?
Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 10:03:47 AM, R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTE
>RSP> With the latest beta, you can use the new filtering system with a
>file that
>RSP> has a line like this in it:
>
>RSP> HELO 5 CONTAINS $domain
>RSP> -Scott
>
>Is the above 5 a weight? If so, do you have to use weight with this
>test?
Be VERY ca
Monday, June 24, 2002, 4:10:01 PM, R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Snip]
>>Is there a test that can catch "$domain" exclusively?
RSP> With the latest beta, you can use the new filtering system with a file that
RSP> has a line like this in it:
RSP> HELO 5 CONTAINS $domain
R
>Scott, I've now been running DECLUDE for two days and from a first look,
>I like the product. However, it has been catching a large number of
>valid messages and I'm wondering what actions to take with them. The
>most common failures are on REVDNS,
That one does have a lot of false positives
>1. Can I place more than one DNS server in the global.cfg and will Declude
>use the second one listed if the first becomes unavailable? E.g.:
>
>DNS xxx.xxx.xxx.1
>DNS xxx.xxx.xxx.2
No -- Declude only uses 1 DNS server.
>We had an admin reload the server that Declude was pointed to f
