Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-14 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Title: Message The Space was the issue. Added the "-" and all is well. - Original Message - From: Matt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:37 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Fred,Tho

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
414 x20 (Business) Fax:    +1 201 934-9206 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 04:37 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 F

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
midt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:02 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Hi Frederick:   I don't know if this has been asked/suggested already and I don't

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Nick
half Of Frederick Samarelli Sent: Wednesday, > April 13, 2005 04:28 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: > [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 > > Good Thought but I have these others without problem. Thanks. > > XINHEADER X-Note: Total spam weight of this E

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:02 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Hi Frederick:   I don't know if this has been asked/suggested already and I don't have time to go back to the RFCs to see if embedded

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
Message - From: Andy Schmidt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:02 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Hi Frederick:   I don't know if this has been asked/suggested already and I do

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread David Barker
5 4:28 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Good Thought but I have these others without problem. Thanks.   XINHEADER   X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.XINHEADER   X-RBL-Warning: Total weight: %WEIGHT%XINHEADER  

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Darin Cox
:27 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Good Thought but I have these others without problem. Thanks.   XINHEADER   X-Note: Total spam weight of this E-mail is %WEIGHT%.XINHEADER   X-RBL-Warning: Total weight: %WEIGHT%XINHEADER  X-Note: This E-mail was scanned

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frederick SamarelliSent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 04:28 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Good Thought but I have these others without problem. Thanks

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Hi Frederick:   I don't know if this has been asked/suggested already and I don't have time to go back to the RFCs to see if embedded spaces are permitted in the header name. But have you ever tried elim

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
derick SamarelliSent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 03:42 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Mike/Matt (thanks for your help) You should be able to duplicated by just forwarding an email to an outside account using the proble

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
Based on this I would agree then that the %TESTSFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS% variable is inserting a double CRLF instead of a single one, and this would seem to explain everything else that I was commenting on as it would seem to follow that the other things were merely effects of this, and complicated/o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Mike/Matt (thanks for your help) You should be able to duplicated by just forwarding an email to an outside account using the problem line at the bottom.   As not to confuse things I simplified the process.   Send an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] =>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (forwarded to) =>>> [EM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Mike Higgins
Business) Fax:    +1 201 934-9206 http://www.HM-Software.com/ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:32 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
.6 - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Darin Cox
Which line? Darin.     - Original Message - From: Frederick Samarelli To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:58 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 We have incoming email scanned by Symantec Gateway Antivirus then have to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 1:43 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Fred,The example that you sent earlier was being processed twice and it was passing through IMail to Symantec and back to IMail with some other

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
0: X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:0 - Original Message - From: Matt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Fred, It looks like two full sets of Declude&#x

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
Found the problem.   It was this line.   #XINHEADER  X-Spam-Tests-Failed Weight: %TESTSFAILEDWITHWEIGHTS%   I removed it and problem went away.   Any thoughts.  

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT:0 - Original Message - From: Matt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 11:49 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 Fred,It looks like two full sets of Declude's XINHEADER's, and some

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
started after the update from 2.0.5 to 2.0.6 - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 I think we're going to ha

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
See attached config.   The problem only started after the update from 2.0.5 to 2.0.6 - Original Message - From: Darin Cox To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:39 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Darin Cox
I think we're going to have to see the Global.CFG to figure out if there's a misconfiguration.  I certainly looks like your entire XINHEADER config is duplicated. Darin.     - Original Message - From: Frederick Samarelli To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13,

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Matt
Fred, It would help if you could share the entire source of the E-mail including the headers.  This sounds like something is inserting an extra line break in the headers and your mail client is interpreting that as the start of the body. Matt Frederick Samarelli wrote: Since I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Darin Cox
: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:13 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6 They are all a problem.   They show up in the body of the email after it is forwarded.   If I pull the email directly from the server it is fine. Noting shows in the body.   If I

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Frederick Samarelli
at the top of the body of the message.   The lines represent all my XINHEADER references. - Original Message - From: Andy Schmidt To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:02 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Dan Horne
new with v 2.0.6 Hi Frederick:   May be you should also post the relevant lines from the Globa.cfg so that one can see what lines you requested to be inserted.   Also, which of these lines specifically are incorrect? Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Something new with v 2.0.6

2005-04-13 Thread Andy Schmidt
Title: Message Hi Frederick:   May be you should also post the relevant lines from the Globa.cfg so that one can see what lines you requested to be inserted.   Also, which of these lines specifically are incorrect? Best RegardsAndy SchmidtPhone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)Fax:    +1 20