This bug was mentioned in the Ubuntu 18.04.2 release notes as "fixed",
however this issue was not fixed in Ubuntu 18.04 and probably won't be.
As far as I know, Joaquim Rocha now works again on GNOME Software at
Endless, so we could ask him to provide a better patches, but I don't
think the patche
Thanks, for the record, I previously discussed this issue with upstream
and about them including such a change in a point release. But they
didn't want to commit to making and supporting major changes to the old
flatpak plugin (from gnome-software 3.30 the plugin was rewritten and
the issue doesn't
Settings as wontfix for bionic atm, it doesn't sound like anyone is
working on fixing in for that serie, that can be changed back if someone
cares enough about the issue and works on a SRU though
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
** Changed in: gnom
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Released => Triaged
** Tags removed: verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Ti
Was this issue really fixed? I thought the patches were reverted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME
This bug was fixed in the package gnome-software -
3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.8
---
gnome-software (3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.8) bionic; urgency=medium
* Re-released to generate correct .changes file
gnome-software (3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.7) bionic; urgency=medium
* debian/rules:
*
deb
** Patch removed: "gs-add-related-refs-support.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1754864/+attachment/5191969/+files/gs-add-related-refs-support.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t
Marking as verification-done; the change that regressed has been
reverted, so this bug isn't actually fixed, but it also hasn't
introduced the downgrade problem.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-done
** Tags added: verification-done-bionic
--
You received this bug
Hello AsciiWolf, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-software into bionic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
software/3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.8 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
I've re-uploaded the SRU with these changes removed. If someone can re-
propose fixed patches and/or additional patches to resolve this then we
can consider it for another SRU.
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notifica
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~3v1n0/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+git/gnome-software/+merge/358488
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Ti
Proper Flatpak support is really important to end-users as Flatpak is
becoming a standard in cross-distro application distribution.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
It would be great if some GS dev from Canonical could fix the current
patches.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak related refs are not installed whe
You're right. I can confirm that the runtime related refs are now
installed without any issue, however the new code seems to have problems
with downgrades. :-( Unfortunately, I am not a good in C so I cannot fix
it myself and Joaquim Rocha doesn't work on GNOME Software anymore.
Other possible sol
The good news is that this now correctly installs themes when installing
an app.
Unfortunately for me test "2.4 Update an app in GNOME Software" from the
flatpak test plan [0], fails for me with the package from proposed.
After reverting to an older commit hash, then refreshing gnome-software
it
Hello AsciiWolf, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gnome-software into bionic-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-
software/3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.5 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
@Andrew
The debian patches come from the ubuntu-3-28 branch [1] and are
committed to the packaging branch [2]. Yeah, it's a bit complicated...
[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-software/tree/ubuntu-3-28
[2]
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/gnome-softwar
@Robert, will you be generating a debdiff for the gnome-3-28 branch when
it's ready? (I see you are making other changes and I'm not familiar how
you are taking the git repo and turning the changes into debian
patches).
Also I see that 3.28.1-0ubuntu4.18.04.4 [0] is currently stuck [1] in
bionic-p
** Also affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Stat
I believe this issue is resolved in cosmic and is only an issue in
bionic. Normally such issues are marked as "Fix Released" for "ubuntu"
and then proposed to the series bionic. I don't have the permissions to
do this, Robert do you normally work with this workflow ?
Also I will test the normal fl
** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak related refs are not installed w
@Robert Ancell Done. See: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu
/gnome-software/merge_requests/8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak related refs
@AsciiWolf - if you want to propose this in 18.04 the best way is to do
a MR to the ubuntu-3-28 branch on
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-software - that's where
we get the patches for the .deb.
A brief look at the changes seems like it should be fine. I'd drop the
test changes unl
By the way, GS developer told me that they didn't want to merge it
because they don't have enough people and time to further maintain it.
So if someone from Canonical would be willing to maintain it in the
gnome-3-28 branch, there should not be any problem having the patches
upstream.
--
You rece
(https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-
software/merge_requests/58#note_328627)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak related refs are not installed whe
Any progress?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1754864
Title:
Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on
Ubuntu 18.04
To manage notifications
** Summary changed:
- Flatpak runtime extensions are not installed when using GNOME Software on
Ubuntu
+ Flatpak related refs are not installed when using GNOME Software on Ubuntu
18.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t
27 matches
Mail list logo