[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2023-02-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1828107 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828107 Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-10-15 Thread Malte Deiseroth
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1828107 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828107 I guess this is a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1828107 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1828107 gvfs can't list shares from smb servers that disabled

[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-07-14 Thread Marc Deslauriers
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881780 Title: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations"

Re: [Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Jon
Logically this seems to be correct. I’m not a samba developer, so I don’t have direct insights to what is happening when. I don’t know much about the samba discovery process. The easy way to test this is startup FreeNAS in a VM because they disable SMBv1 by default. On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 2:05

[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ah, I think I see what you mean. Nautilus (gvfs actually) is temporarily downgrading the protocol for the discovery, but it's not reverting that when trying to actually connect to a discovered host. Is that it? This does ring a bell, it was supposed to be fixed with an SRU on bionic, and in the

Re: [Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Jon
No but when you use the automatic detection of smb services which I’m guessing uses NetBios or something like that it won’t connect if SMBv1 is disabled. So simply navigating to Other Locations and clicking on the automatically enumerated host names, the connection will completely fail if SMBv1

[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
When you manually connect, by typing in the full smb url, it doesn't mean SMB1 is being used. You can verify that by running "sudo smbstatus" on the server. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Eduardo Barretto
Hi @ahasenack, @seb128 I saw you've both have dealt with smb issues. Could you please take a look on this issue? Thanks! ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is