Hi!
> can you please explain to me, in a short sentence, what do you want to
> achieve? not how, but precisely what.
Have a good way to get in touch with the design team/other core gnome
teams that is not real-time and be able to participate in discussions
about desktop-wide design topics.
> Dav
hi;
sorry, I'm attaching this to the latest email on the thread, but it's
really a request to both Johannes and Dave.
can you please explain to me, in a short sentence, what do you want to
achieve? not how, but precisely what.
I've seen people going round in circles and I still haven't understoo
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Here are two reasons I could see for people wanting their IRC
> conversations to be unlogged, along with my solution:
>
> * Sharing sensitive information.
> - Don't do that on IRC. Use a private chat if you have to.
> But if it's really sensi
On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 13:05 +, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> >> On 06/02/11 02:02, Robert Ancell wrote:
> >>>
> >>> A huge +1 on this. IRC is much more productive, but it's crucial that
>
Hi!
> This discussion reminds me of the one we had about switching to DVCS
> some years back. At that time, most of the core developers wanted to
> use git but most of the rest were opposed to that. While I don't claim
> this situation is the same, this discussion is also about which tools
> to
Hi,
Allan Day wrote:
> Dave Neary wrote:
>> There is no transparency about what the design team is, who has
>> what skills, etc.
>>
>> Many stakeholders and developers who have design problems do not have
>> any relationship with the design team at all.
>>
>> This is the problem I think we need to
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Dave Neary wrote:
> I really don't think IRC logs are a good way of communicating anything. It's
> better than unlogged, but really only marginally.
This discussion reminds me of the one we had about switching to DVCS
some years back. At that time, most of t
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
>> On 06/02/11 02:02, Robert Ancell wrote:
>>>
>>> A huge +1 on this. IRC is much more productive, but it's crucial that
>>> it's logged for people who can't attend. (I'm always hitting t
On 3 June 2011 19:55, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/02/11 02:02, Robert Ancell wrote:
>>
>> A huge +1 on this. IRC is much more productive, but it's crucial that
>> it's logged for people who can't attend. (I'm always hitting this
>> problem in GNOME trying to work out what happened while I
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/02/11 02:02, Robert Ancell wrote:
>>
>> A huge +1 on this. IRC is much more productive, but it's crucial that
>> it's logged for people who can't attend. (I'm always hitting this
>> problem in GNOME trying to work out what happen
Hi,
On 06/02/11 02:02, Robert Ancell wrote:
A huge +1 on this. IRC is much more productive, but it's crucial that
it's logged for people who can't attend. (I'm always hitting this
problem in GNOME trying to work out what happened while I was sleeping
in Australia).
This works really well in Ub
11 matches
Mail list logo
