On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:29 PM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
I'm testing this now and will push as soon as I'm sure I haven't
broken anything.
Done.
Michael
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Just to follow up...
> Do you hav eany details on this one? It built during distcheck, I just
> tried building the tarball into an rpm and that worked, and it's not
> broken in continuous.
This ended up being the moduleset's GDM requiring plymouth to build,
and Javier's distro not having plymouth
Thanks to Florian for remembering this trick. For those at GUADEC for the
time being you can add to your ~/.gitconfig:
[url "https://git.gnome.org/browse;]
insteadOf = git://git.gnome.org
[url "https://anongit.free desktop.org/git"]
insteadOf = git://anongit.freedesktop.org
On Mon, Jul 31,
On 7/31/17, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I'd also ask the GUADEC 2018 hosts to keep in mind the importance of
> having a good network connection for the unconference days. I'm told
> the MMU network is blocking email and IRC in addition to git. It's also
> blocking my
I just fixed all the .json manifests and .app files in the master
branch of gnome-apps-nightly, as well as the .json manifest for the
master branch of the GNOME Sdk.
--
Mathieu
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 15:40 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> I've just gotten bitten by this as well, and have started
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Bastian Ilso
wrote:
We also experienced this issue at the newcomers workshop as many
flatpak manifests also download dependencies using the git://
protocol. It'd be great to have these fixed or maybe have a fallback
behavior (having
I've just gotten bitten by this as well, and have started moving all
the ones in gnome-apps-nightly from git:// to https://
--
Mathieu
On Mon, 2017-07-31 at 14:15 +0100, Bastian Ilso wrote:
> We also experienced this issue at the newcomers workshop as many
> flatpak manifests also download
We also experienced this issue at the newcomers workshop as many
flatpak manifests also download dependencies using the git:// protocol.
It'd be great to have these fixed or maybe have a fallback behavior
(having several URLs to try in the manifests?).
-Bastian
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:29
Hey,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:12 AM wrote:
> 'gdm'
Do you hav eany details on this one? It built during distcheck, I just
tried building the tarball into an rpm and that worked, and it's not
broken in continuous.
I can try doing a jhbuild run with the moduleset I
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Arun Raghavan
wrote:
Is there some place we can look at logs of the current build? I don't
have a jhbuild-y setup here, but I'd be happy to look at the gst-*
failures.
Nope, got to ask Javier if he remembers why it failed. Sorry. We know
On 31 July 2017 at 12:36, Arun Raghavan wrote:
> Is there some place we can look at logs of the current build?
Same here, fwupd builds fine here, and also in Travis...
Richard
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On 31 July 2017 at 12:11, wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> There are too many broken modules right now! Here is the list of modules
> that Javier had to skip when releasing 3.25.4:
>
> 'pango', 'at-spi2-atk', 'vte', 'gdm', 'clutter-gtk', 'graphene', 'nautilus',
> 'glade', 'libgxps',
Hi devs,
There are too many broken modules right now! Here is the list of
modules that Javier had to skip when releasing 3.25.4:
'pango', 'at-spi2-atk', 'vte', 'gdm', 'clutter-gtk', 'graphene',
'nautilus', 'glade', 'libgxps', 'libgepub', 'gnome-font-viewer',
'fwupd', 'gnome-terminal',
13 matches
Mail list logo