Le mar. 7 nov. 2017 à 16:11, PWR PWR a écrit :
Great discussion! I would encourage making things as customization
and personalized as possible, as a principle of open source software.
*snip*
having them hard-coded is simply going back to what large
corporations are doing to control masses of
On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 11:15 +, Allan Day wrote:
> Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> ...
> >
> > This does not mean that gnome-screenshot should be made
> > unremovable,
> > but it definitely needs some additional thought.
> >
>
> Documentation is another factor to consider. Currently, if you look
>
Great discussion! I would encourage making things as customization and
personalized as possible, as a principle of open source software.
Let's not make things required and unremovable to the fullest extent
possible, to avoid leading consumers down a path of what's right or wrong
according to someo
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Allan Day wrote:
3. I guess I just find it strange that this mechanism is so
decentralised. Can anyone use ?
Yes.
Who makes the decisions about what's included and what isn't? How is
that monitored and managed?
Application developers make the decision themse
Bastien Nocera wrote:
...
> I don't think that applications such as Calendar, Contacts, or finding
> and reminding apps should be removed from the requirements for a well-
> rounded, default desktop. How they're installed is a technical question
> that's not relevant to the fact that they're need