On Mit, 2006-06-07 at 14:05 -0400, Joseph E. Sacco, Ph.D. wrote:
> I just tried out Frederic's suggestion:
>
> * uninstall gtk+-2.9.2
> * extract the source from the f.g.o tarball
> * rm gtk/gtkbuiltincache.h
> * build
> * install
>
> The bad news is I still see the error.
Should be fixed in CV
On Mon, 2006-07-17 at 07:55 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:
> søn, 16 07 2006 kl. 23:33 -0500, skrev Jason D. Clinton:
>
> While you provided a fine run down of arguments, I believe you forgot a
> vital one, Mono can be optimized, we can cut down ressource consumption,
> we can indeed do better - we
On Don, 2006-07-20 at 23:24 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> I totally agree but wouldn't it be better to use native languages that
> offer all this like the D language (http://www.digitalmars.com/d/).
>
> No one has ever justified why we need a VM given all its disadvantages
> (speed - especiall
On Mit, 2006-07-26 at 18:32 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 11:25 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:21 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > > > gtk-sharp-2.10.0 would keep glib-sharp, pango-sharp, atk-sharp,
> > > > gdk-sharp, gtk-sharp, glade-sharp, and
On Fre, 2006-10-13 at 16:43 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 09:47 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 19:28 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 16:48 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Following on this, I'm looking (and almo
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:22 -0700, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > > That was just a Java web applet checked in as a jar file, wasn't it?
> >
> > Yep. It just means JDS can show an http address in the vino-preferences
> > dialog that's usable by anyone (firewalls permitting), whereas the
> > communit
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 18:59 +0100, Denis Washington wrote:
> I created two mockups for possible keyboard and mouse capplets in GNOME
> 2.20. Their aim is to incorporate accessibility features in both; the
> existing keyboard a11y features into Keyboard and the already discussed
> Mousetweaks settin
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 17:20 +0100, Mark wrote:
> > for now it cross compiles into c but its a mistake to assume its just
> > syntactic sugar!
>
> So that means that (for now) it is "syntatic sugar" and is basically
> c. so the compiled program has the memory and speed advantages of c.
The fact t
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 13:08 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> The problem I see with the proposed scheme is that we can't
> fit step (e) into it, since 2.12.2 is never in SVN. With our
> current scheme, you can do this:
>
> svn checkout $(url)/tags/MY_PROGRAM_2_12_2
> make distcheck
>
> and get
able
> preferences[1], and I can't see how users (and sysadmins for default and
> mandatory values) can have any interest to set window geometry.
I have strong interest in moving and resizing my windows, I don't see
how this is not user editable... Can you explain why you think t
On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 18:15 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 18:02 +0200, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> >> Il giorno mer, 18/06/2008 alle 11.23 -0400, Matthew Barnes ha scritto:
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:28 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> 2008/6/26 Mathias Hasselmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 26.06.2008, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Alexander Jones:
> >> Agreed, we need to move towards expecting Composited as default and
> >> Direct as a niche case, but this was ju
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 17:55 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > I really want compositing but I can't use a GL-based one
> > on all systems, as for example even with some recent Intel desktop
> > mainboards you can't have DRI with a screen area l
7;t guarantee language stability, however, that will be
the case for 2.24, if everything goes as planned. Also, it makes sense
to allow the module maintainers to decide this, in my opinion, as long
as they distribute the generated C sources.
Jürg
--
Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 10:08 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 01 juillet 2008 à 10:30 +1200, Callum McKenzie a écrit :
> > As an aside: ultimately it will be necessary to move it from a hacking
> > dependency to a build dependency. Novice developers work from tarballs,
> > not SVN and you w
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 11:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 01 juillet 2008 à 10:49 +0200, Jürg Billeter a écrit :
> > and the build
> > system should rebuild the C code when the .vala files have changed,
> > similar to how other generated files are handled.
>
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 12:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Sorry if it has been already discussed but, where can I find the
> original "New module decisions for 2.26" message. I can only find
> replies to it but I cannot find the main thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/desktop-devel-list@gnome.org/
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:57 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
> Is there plans to replace HAL by GIO or devicekit ? Hal will be
> deprecated soon afaik.
Richard Hughes has already ported the battery handling of Tracker to
DeviceKit-power. It's used if available, otherwise HAL is used. The
volume handling
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
> 2.30.
>
> [...]
>
> This is therefore a 'special' external dependency: it would only be
> required when building from git (or hacking on the code).
>
> It makes sense t
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 18:43 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Jürg Billeter wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:10 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> >> I'd like to propose Vala as an official external dependency for GNOME
> >> 2.30.
&
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 17:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 12:11 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > I would rephrase this as "valac as a build dependency for gnome"
> >
> > as valac is like yacc/bison/flex in that there is no runtime dependency
> > and only people developing o
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:02 +0100, Paolo Borelli wrote:
> I accepted a patch of gnome goal that updated the build system and
> didn't notice that version bump
> I do not see any strong reason to force 0.41.0, gtksourceview built just
> fine with previus intltool versions up to a couple of days ago.
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 02:24 +0300, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Frederic Peters wrote:
> > General questions first:
> >
> > - Are there frequent releases of those?
>
> The GUPnP libraries, yes! libgee used to be very frequently released
> until recently when t
Vincent brought to my attention that there are some packages out there
that use pkg-config to check for the presence and version of the Vala
compiler. However, this is wrong and should be removed in all affected
packages as soon as possible.
The pkg-config file is installed for libvala, which is a
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:23 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Here is a quick analysis of the status of builds on build.gnome.org.
> The one-line summary is that getting webkit and e-d-s to build against
> current GTK+ will get us quite a bit closer to a fully building tree.
> But there is also a bun
On Tue, 2012-08-07 at 21:35 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> There are a number of modules which haven't had a 3.5.5 release yet,
> and should probably get one:
> gnome-control-center
> gnome-settings-daemon
Rico Tzschichholz asked on IRC to review and apply the CUPS 1.6 build
fixes before releasin
On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 09:40 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 11/09/12 08:38, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > As for performance issues with libicu that has never been a problem
> > for our use cases. There might be faster alternatives, but the speed
> > is a non-issue for the stuff that I've
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:51 +, Charles T.Smith wrote:
> I've spent an hour or so looking around /usr/lib/python/site-packages/gtweak
> and haven't found what it does yet... it occurs to me that one shouldn't
> have to reverse engineer a tool in order to learn how to configure something
> ...
>
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 14:49 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Anyway, the problem is a bootstrap version of vala needs to be
> installed as a sysdep, but we can't make a sysdep for it until the vala
> developers stop pointlessly bumping their pkg-config version early
> single release.
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 17:15 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> And what about doing general development work? I can't really do much
> inside BuildStream's shell. And even running yelp leaves it pretty
> crippled, because it doesn't have access to /usr/share or D-Bus.
To run yelp with a useful set of h
he deadline for API documentation of new API is
one week after API freeze. Lack of compliance will be treated the same
as freeze breaks.
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/NewApiDocs
Jürg
--
Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
desktop-devel-
31 matches
Mail list logo
