Vineet Garg created CALCITE-3952:
Summary: Improve SortRemoveRule to remove Sort based on rowcount
Key: CALCITE-3952
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3952
Project: Calcite
I
Made a mistake on the example above, and update it as follows:
// Table function windowing syntax.
SELECT
product_id, count(*), window_start
FROM TABLE(TUMBLE(order, DESCRIPTOR(rowtime), INTERVAL '1' hour))
GROUP BY product_id, window_start
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:31 PM Rui Wang wrote:
Hi community,
I want to kick off a discussion about deprecating grouped window functions
(GROUP BY TUMBLE/HOP/SESSION) as the table function windowing support
becomes a thing [1] (FROM TABLE(TUMBLE/HOP/SESSION)). The current stage of
table function windowing is TUMBLE support is checked in. HOP an
I assume that by GitHub page you mean [1].
For quite some time linq4j is part of calcite [2] so I think that [1] is
not maintained anymore.
The backlog in [1] also looks a bit obsolete.
Julian can correct me if I am wrong.
In my previous email, I was talking about relational expressions (i.e.,
Rel
Ruben Q L created CALCITE-3951:
--
Summary: Support different comparison based on collation
Key: CALCITE-3951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3951
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: I
Filed a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3950
XING JIN 于2020年4月22日周三 下午2:51写道：
> Hi Vineet ~
> +1 on your analysis.
> Checking below case in agg.iq. We can see that the behavior of GROUPING
> function in Calcite is the same as Hive.
>
> # GROUPING in SELECT clause of CUBE quer
Jin Xing created CALCITE-3950:
-
Summary: Doc of SqlGroupingFunction contradicts with its behavior
Key: CALCITE-3950
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3950
Project: Calcite
Issue
