+1
2017-10-15 21:19 GMT+08:00 Lu Cao :
> Sure, will create the Jira ticket.
>
> Thanks,
> Lionel
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Liang Chen
> wrote:
>
> > Hi lionel
> >
> > As per mailing list discussion result, no objection. so can you create an
> > umbrella jira to remove spark 1.5 & 1.6
Sure, will create the Jira ticket.
Thanks,
Lionel
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Liang Chen wrote:
> Hi lionel
>
> As per mailing list discussion result, no objection. so can you create an
> umbrella jira to remove spark 1.5 & 1.6 code in 1.3.0.
>
> Regards
> Liang
>
>
> lionel061201 wrote
>
Hi lionel
As per mailing list discussion result, no objection. so can you create an
umbrella jira to remove spark 1.5 & 1.6 code in 1.3.0.
Regards
Liang
lionel061201 wrote
> Hi community,
> Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5, 1.6,
> 2.1), the project has becom
+1
Regards
Bhavya
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:15 PM, jarray wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 10/10/2017 14:13, gururajshetty wrote:
> + 1
>
> Regards,
> Gururaj
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.
> n5.nabble.com/
>
+1
On 10/10/2017 14:13, gururajshetty wrote:
+ 1
Regards,
Gururaj
--
Sent from:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/
+ 1
Regards,
Gururaj
--
Sent from:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/
+1
--
Sent from:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/
+1
Regards
Manish Gupta
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 at 5:11 PM, Suprith T Jain wrote:
> +1
>
> On 09-Oct-2017 7:27 AM, "Lu Cao" wrote:
>
> > Hi community,
> > Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5,
> 1.6,
> > 2.1), the project has become more and more difficult to maintai
+1
On 09-Oct-2017 7:27 AM, "Lu Cao" wrote:
> Hi community,
> Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5, 1.6,
> 2.1), the project has become more and more difficult to maintain and has
> many redundant code.
> I propose to stop supporting spark 1.5 &1.6 and focus on spa
+1
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Kunal Kapoor
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 09-Oct-2017 9:32 AM, "岑玉海" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Best regards!
> > Yuhai Cen
> >
> >
> > 在2017年10月9日 09:56,Lu Cao 写道:
> > Hi community,
> > Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5,
> 1.6,
> > 2
+1
On 09-Oct-2017 9:32 AM, "岑玉海" wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Best regards!
> Yuhai Cen
>
>
> 在2017年10月9日 09:56,Lu Cao 写道:
> Hi community,
> Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5, 1.6,
> 2.1), the project has become more and more difficult to maintain and has
> many redundant
+1
Best regards!
Yuhai Cen
在2017年10月9日 09:56,Lu Cao 写道:
Hi community,
Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5, 1.6,
2.1), the project has become more and more difficult to maintain and has
many redundant code.
I propose to stop supporting spark 1.5 &1.6 and focus on
Hi community,
Currently we have three spark related module in carbondata(spark 1.5, 1.6,
2.1), the project has become more and more difficult to maintain and has
many redundant code.
I propose to stop supporting spark 1.5 &1.6 and focus on spark 2.1(2.2).
That will keep the project clean and simple
13 matches
Mail list logo