lol, I'll take a look at it as soon as possible!!!
thanks!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Claudio Squarcella
wrote:
> Hi Simone and all,
>
>
> On 19/
Hi Simone and all,
On 19/02/2012 22:12, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi (and sorry for the late)
I personally don't see the reason to be open to *Operations until
*Monoid (actually, wrongly, *Weight) until there is the real need of.
Anyway, please share a patch in the issue you filled - code talks mu
Hi (and sorry for the late)
I personally don't see the reason to be open to *Operations until
*Monoid (actually, wrongly, *Weight) until there is the real need of.
Anyway, please share a patch in the issue you filled - code talks much
better, I could finally see what I am currently missing ;)
lo
Hi,
* Doubles can also be multiplied, but so far we did not need to
include that in our stack of operations and properties. If we ever
need to do so, it will be enough to create another interface
extending OrderedMonoid and change the implemented interface in
DoubleWeightOperations
Hi Cloud/IO :)
> * Doubles can also be multiplied, but so far we did not need to
> include that in our stack of operations and properties. If we ever
> need to do so, it will be enough to create another interface
> extending OrderedMonoid and change the implemented interface in
> DoubleWe
Hello Simone,
It would be much more naturally to my hears hearing it as
BigDecimalOrderedMonoid, doesn't it?
you have a valid point. However my intention is to decouple
implementations from underlying interfaces, because they might evolve
and grow over time.
Let me give you two examples:
Hi Claudio,
while the idea is fine, we should adopt IMHO a little consistent
naming. Why an OrderedMonoid shall be called
BigDecimal*Operations* ? What makes it so different to an
OrderedMonoid ?
It would be much more naturally to my hears hearing it as
BigDecimalOrderedMonoid, doesn't it?
-Simo
Hi Claudio,
> I will soon work on it. If there is any last minute suggestion I will be
> happy to hear that.
there isn't any suggestion by me...
in my point of view your suggestion can be useful and increase the code
expressiveness.
have a nice day :)
--
Marco Speranza
Google Code: http://co
Hi all,
following previous discussion on ML I opened a JIRA issue to rename
classes/variables related to operations on weights:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-395
I will soon work on it. If there is any last minute suggestion I will be
happy to hear that.
Ciao,
--
Claudio Sq
