+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 15 November 2009 13:07
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.8 (take 2)
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.8
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done com
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 15 November 2009 02:34
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.5
Forgot the list of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=1231051
1&version=12314303&styleName=Ht
+1
David
2009/11/15 Daniel Kulp :
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.5
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.4 release. Over 90 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.2.5
>
>
> List of issues:
>
> The Maven staging area is a
+1
/Eoghan
2009/11/15 Daniel Kulp
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.8
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.1.7 release. Over 25 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.1.8
>
>
> List of issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org
+1
2009/11/15 Daniel Kulp
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.5
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.4 release. Over 90 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.2.5
>
>
> List of issues:
>
> The Maven staging area is at:
> ht
Fine with me too.
Cheers
Alessio
Benson Margulies wrote:
I'm +1 for turning off 2.1 support.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Question for everyone.
What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
2.1.x line?
2.2.x will have been out for
+1
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.8
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.1.7 release. Over 25 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.1.8
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pr
The issue I mentioned in the previous emails has been solved on JBoss
side, I'll commit the fix in jbws once the Apache CXF artifacts are on
the m2 repo.
I'm going to run the jaxws and jws modules of the JavaEE 5 TCK now, but
I won't be able to get results before the vote is closed.
Here is my
Hi
Question for everyone.
What are peoples thoughts about making 2.1.9 (in January) the last of the
2.1.x line?
2.2.x will have been out for 10 months by then so users definitely should have
had plenty of time to migrate. 2.2.x is generally a simple migration from
2.1.x. I think m
I've taken a deeper look at this. Se don't have a custom ResourceResolver
installed and that's the point, as Cxf fails in getting a
WEB-INF/wsdl/foo.wsdl resource from tue classloader when the classloader
jboss provides is the one you get for a war app (a Url classloader pointing
to WEB-INF/classe
10 matches
Mail list logo
