uot;bar"]}
>
> Seems like the JSON is generated via JAXB and an XMLStreamWriter, which
> unfortunately is too limited to provide real control over the JSON.
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
> Sent
everything.
Not sure how much code can be expected from a GSoC student.
Cheers,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 14:49
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi
I'm not actually sure. What would be the scope of s
tison gets actually utilized...
If yes - then I'm not sure it would qualify ? Would you define the scope
differently ?
cheers, Sergey
- Original Message -
From: "Tong, Gary (IDEAS)"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 2:21 PM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
Would you want to give
Would you want to give this to someone from GSoC? This could actually be a
pretty sweet project.
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 12:14
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
> If you give me until next w
ssage -
From: "Tong, Gary (IDEAS)"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:53 AM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
Hi Sergey,
If you give me until next week I should be able to package something together
and send it to you.
Alternatively, this would be a great project for GSoC, if it's no
ginal Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 06 April 2009 12:01
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
>>
>> I ended up writing my own converter for JSON that uses its own
>> annotations seperate from JAXB. It's a pretty q
Hi Gary
I ended up writing my own converter for JSON that uses its own annotations
seperate from JAXB. It's a pretty quick implementation, and only does what
I need it to do. It depends on the JSON objects from json.org, which are
also included in Jettison under a different package. The annot
-- Original Message -
From: "Gary Tong"
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Sergey,
Sorry it too so long to reply to this.
I ended up writing my own converter for JSON that uses its own annotations
seperate from JAXB. It's a pretty
t level in putting something like this into CXF?
Cheers,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 18 February 2009 15:15
To: Sergey Beryozkin; dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
>
>> 2) Are you guys interested in replac
Just FYI : http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTISON-65
Hopefully it will be fixed in Jettison eventually though it's difficult to
predict when. As I said we can discuss the option of shipping a non-JAXB
based JSON provider but I reckon it is also worth enhancing the Jettison
when possible - so if
Hi Gary
2) Are you guys interested in replacing the existing JSON provider, or making an alternative one available that allows a bit more
control over how the JSON is rendered?
I'd happy to consider replacing the existing one with a better quality one if it were JAXB driven as a number of use
which such a new provider might bring in.
Thanks, Sergey
- Original Message -
From: "Tong, Gary (FID)"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the quick responses.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about. Let&
e JSON
is rendered?
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 10 February 2009 13:23
To: Sergey Beryozkin; dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
I think going with ContextResolver may be a workable workaround,
but I'd like to
- Original Message -
From: "Tong, Gary (FID)"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:24 AM
Subject: RE: JSON in CXF
I think it's a limitation of the underlying JSON library. Something like:
@XmlRootElement
public class Foo {
@XmlElementWrapper(name="
ed to provide real control over
the JSON.
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 10 February 2009 10:48
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired.
Do you reckon
rol over the JSON.
Thanks,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sbery...@progress.com]
Sent: 10 February 2009 10:48
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: Re: JSON in CXF
Hi Gary
> JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired.
Do you reckon it's the limitations
Hi Gary
JSON via JAXB definitely leaves something to be desired.
Do you reckon it's the limitations of the underlying JSON library that we use (Jettison) or do you refer to the insufficient number
of hooks for our JSON JAXRS reader/writer whiich would help in producing a better quality JSON ?
17 matches
Mail list logo